Hi Ron,
The colours look great on my screen. I am using Safari, which I know can read colour spaces and this might be why.
They are all good images. I judge competitions pretty regularly. But it is difficult to know how harsh to be with comments, without seeing the standard of the competition! I have assumed this is for an important competition - with lots of equally strong images.
a) The pink anemonefish and banggai. I think the interest of this image is the meeting of the two fish. Therefore I find this shot slighty to wide. I think the black in the top corner is distracted. If images only need to be A4 (30cm) then you could crop this one? Well worth entering on interest factor - I think it is a very appealing shot, but needs a slightly tighter crop.
B) Blue ring. Interesting shot of cool critter with eggs. Background pretty uninteresting and subject is a bit lost in it. Also you are not on eyelevel of the octo. The slightly downward camera angle reduces eye contact with the viewer and subject (plus reduces the separation with the background). Again worth entering for behaviour/interest value. If the judges haven't seen a shot like this before it could do very well.
c) Hairy froggy fishing. Another nice behaviour shot. Technically good and full of the eye contact that wasn't in the blue ring shot (although still a bit of a downward camera angle). Technically good - but with so many photographers going to Lembeh I think that there may be several near identical shots in the competition, which means that none will win. If you think that there won't be lots of lembeh shots then get this one in there.
d) Jawfish. Good behaviour and characterful shot. Could do very well. Let down a bit by the centre of the frame composition. If you could crop it a bit differently it could be a winner. Not the most colourful, but character goes a long way in fish portraits.
e) Slug and shrimp. This shot is probably the weakest of the set.
f) Weedy pygmy. Nice image. Requires the judges to know what it is. If they thing that this is a normal sized seahorse then it won't do anything. If they know how small it is then they will appreciate your skill and it could do well.
g) Yellow bargibanti. I would not enter this one. Too many pygmy shots around, and unless they are totally perfect and different they aren't going to win. This is a good book/magazine shot. But not a competition shot - lacks a punchy colour and the seahorse is ever so slightly facing away.
h) Skeleton shrimp. I can't see the eyes, as it is turning away from the camera. I would not enter this one.
i) Elegant squatty. I like the background (sponge) which shows the crinoid and squatty well. But I find the composition unbalanced to my taste. I wouldn't go with this one.
j) Zebra crab on urchin. Great colours and contrast. Compositionally a bit uninteresting. With a subject that stands out this well on the background I would have gone for a more off centre position for it. But if you have to enter large prints this could do well.
So I would go for a (but cropped a bit more tightly) and b (if the judges haven't seen a shot of this it could do very well). C is also strong (but there may be others) and D could do very well (with a slightly different crop). Finally f could do well if the judges know what it is.
I have said all that assuming this is a normal (but high standard) UW photog competition. I would have chosen different shots if this is a land competition (where g would do well). And if this is a "lembeh" competition then you have to think carefully what the judges are looking for. If they want to promote the wierd creatures of Lembeh then the clownfish is not going to appeal.
Alex