Skip to content

Conservation and the Environment / Archived topic

Australian sea chase saga ends in acquittal

Started by Drew ·

  • 12Posts
  • 12Replies

Read-only discussion

Australian sea chase saga ends in acquittal

12 posts
  1. In 2003, in the style of Master & Commander(aptly starring an ozzie), the Australian navy chased down a fishing boat for 21 days in 3 oceans to arrest patagonian toothfish poachers.

    Their trial just ended and they were found not guilty!

    Details in this report:

    BBC report

    Apparently the first trial in Perth ended with a hung jury and now an acquittal. Now the company which owns the boat wants to sue for the auctioned toothfish and the boat back. I thought only LA had goofy jurists.

    Edited by scubadru
  2. Wow. I cannot believe they were found not guilty!!!!

  3. yeah, with 90 tons of fish, and running for 21 days isn't a sign of guilt. Their extenuating circumstance? They didn't have fishing equipment when they were caught. You'd think in 21 days they would've thrown the crap overboard and cause more net line deaths.

  4. That's bloody disgusting!

     

    How did they explain 90 tons of fish - "oh they just leapt up here of their own volition" - yeah right!

     

    Silly system if you ask me.

  5. I bet the Navy learns their lesson. Next time they will just send a jet to "test" one of their air to water torpedoes in an area that was "thought" to be empty. Whoops. News flash, "Navy accidentally sinks a fishing boat during a training operation, by the time a rescue vessel arrived there were no survivors."

     

    Or no, do I have the Aussies mixed up with the Americans......

  6. Yeah, mad ... isn't it like saying you can't find a murderer guilty if he's not caught in the act !?! :D:D:lol:

  7. Although I hate to agree with the badguys, but is it not possible (not likely but possible) they caught the fish outside of Australian waters. Thus not being caught in the act is a big hole. So I can see how they would have difficulty of convicting them of poaching.

    Edited by acroporas
  8. Except that the Australian navy patrol vessel saw them fishing in Australian waters prior to the chase actually starting...

  9. I don't know why they chased for 21 days. They were within rights to nail the suckers in Ozzie waters in the antarctic. Instead they chased them round to Africa and let the new ZA corvette catch those guys. My maritime law sucks since I was certified as a captain in Croatia (multiple choice is more difficult than I thought :lol:) but if a vessel resists arrests or starts hightailing for international waters... I'd fire warning shots.

  10. This article from The Age (a Melbourne newspaper) provides more detail. It would seem that they weren't actually observed in the act of fishing in Aussie waters.

     

    Fishermen caught in epic chase acquitted

    November 5, 2005 - 5:44PM

     

    Five foreign fishermen have been acquitted of poaching Australian fish stocks in a case that involved the world's longest sea chase and cost the government millions of dollars.

     

    A District Court jury in Perth has found the men not guilty of illegal fishing charges two years after their arrest at the end of the 7,000km pursuit across the Southern Ocean.

     

    Their acquittal is an embarrassing setback for the Australian government as it tries to stop illegal operators plundering prized stocks of Patagonian toothfish in sub-Antarctic waters.

     

    It was the second time the crew of the Uruguayan-registered ship Viarsa 1 had stood trial after a jury failed to reach a verdict last December.

     

    The men, who are from Uruguay, Spain and Chile, have been living in a merchant seamen's hostel in Fremantle for two years and are expected to be repatriated in the next few days.

     

    "It's good news. Obviously they're very emotional because they're going to return to their homelands and they've been away from their families for two years," the men's lawyer Mark Trowell said.

     

    Federal Fisheries Minister Ian Macdonald expressed disbelief at the verdict.

     

    "I am amazed at the decision," he said.

     

    "Notwithstanding the decision, I have no regrets over the incident.

     

    "I would repeat the exercise tomorrow if a foreign fishing vessel is sighted by an Australian patrol vessel inside the Australian Fishing Zone (AFZ)."

     

    Viarsa's Uruguayan captain Ricardo Mario Ribot Cabrera, 58, Spanish first mate Antonio Garcia Perez, 40, officers Francisco Fernandez Olveira, 40, Jose Gonzalez Perez, 38 - also of Spain - and Chilean crewman Roberto Enrique Reyes Guerrero all pleaded not guilty to intentionally using a foreign vessel for commercial operations in the AFZ.

     

    Cabrera and Garcia Perez also denied one count of intentionally having in their charge a foreign boat equipped for fishing inside the zone.

     

    The men were charged following the three-week pursuit begun by an Australian fisheries vessel around Heard and McDonald islands on August 7, 2003, and continued for 7,000km through the mountainous seas of the Southern Ocean.

     

    The chase only ended when armed South African Fisheries officers and security guards boarded the Viarsa with assistance from a South African tug and a British fisheries patrol boat.

     

    The West Australian District Court trial was told Viarsa had almost 97 tonnes of toothfish on board, along with 92 tonnes of bait and hundreds of boxes of fish products when it was finally inspected.

     

    The chase and subsequent prosecution have cost the federal government at least $4.5 million, according to information tabled in the Senate by the government in August.

     

    Some of that money was recovered when the government auctioned the Viarsa's catch for $1.9 million.

     

    Mr Trowell said the Viarsa was never caught with fishing gear in the water and the captain was under orders from Uruguay not to stop once the pursuit began.

     

    "At the end of the day they just didn't have the evidence," he said.

     

    The men would have faced hefty fines if convicted, but people found guilty of illegal fishing cannot be jailed under an international convention observed by Australia.

     

    The pursuit of the Viarsa prompted the government to step up operations against poachers in the Southern Ocean with the addition of the armed fisheries vessel Ocean Viking to patrol the region.

     

    The Viarsa, a trawler worth about $US5 million ($A6.77 million), remains impounded at a shipyard south of Fremantle.

     

    Its Uruguayan owners are continuing action in the Federal Court in Perth in an attempt to recover the ship and be reimbursed for the lost toothfish catch.

  11. Apparently they were spotted and attempts to stop them to ask what is going on etc resulted in them bolting. They also tried to hide in the ice caps in the antarctic belt to elude the ozzie boat which wasn't ice reinforced. If you followed this story from the beginning, the uruguayan government seemed to be involve somehow. All very dodgy and kudos to the Fisheries dept for chasing them to the end.

  12. From what I've heard at work from people involved in tracking the boat when it was in Australian waters and instigating the intercept there was no doubt about what the boat was up to ...

AOI

Account

Navigation

Search

Search

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.