I read this article when it originally came out in the magazine about 6 months ago, but now it's up on their website as well. I can understand publishing something "out of date" in a print mag - because the proof has to go in sometimes months before publication. But IMO, they should have updated the article before posting it on their site:
http://www.scubadiving.com/photo/gear/hous...he_coolpix5000/
Some quotes:
"No RAW file format"
Now available for almost 2 months w/ firmware v1.7
"Digital lag remains problematic for underwater subjects"
Much improved with firmware v1.7
And IMO the worst gaff yet:
"Ikelite has a unique means to handle the strobe synchronization issue with the Coolpix 5000. Recognizing that there is no way to fire a flash without the built-in strobe, and acknowledging that the built-in strobe is too close to the lens (undoubtedly causing backscatter due to particles in suspension under water), Ikelite built a deflector into the housing. "
Ikelite provides a hot-shoe connection and bulkhead so that the photographer can use a sync cord for hard-wired TTL control of nikon compatible underwater strobes...
I know that many "beginning" uw photographers read RSD magazine - and this article - which I THINK is supposed to try to simplify choices - just further confuses people about strobe use with digital cameras...sigh.
Cheers
James Wiseman