- 10Posts
- 10Replies
Read-only discussion
Flabellina Identification
-
-
-
What a beauty! The closest match I've found so far is Flabellina funeka from South Africa. Quite a range extension if so. See what you think - http://seaslugforum.net/factsheet.cfm?base=flabfune
-
i thought it was pretty speco

not sure on the Flabellina funeka ... are the cerata bunched enough? are the number of cerata important? No white tip on the oral tentacles ...
-
Close but no cigar, eh? Re-reading the page on SSF I see the rhinophores have lamellae (skin flaps) while your beastie has papillae - another difference. I'll send it off to Terry for his opinion. Maybe Marli will ride to our rescue in the meantime.

-
Here's a reply from Terry Gosliner (who described F. funeka & many many other species):
"This animal is closest to Flabellina albomarginata Miller, 1971
http://www.seaslugforum.net/factsheet.cfm?base=flabalbo
It is different in its body color, the pink-purple versus white and the
absence opaque white on the oral tentacles and rhinophores. The most
important similarity is the presence of papillae on the posterior side of the
rhinophores. I have some specimens from South Africa of a similar, but
apparently distinct species. It would be great to get some specimens of this animal as I am fairly certain it is undescribed."
-
cool B)
So are lamellae the things that look like a stack of flat plates, and papillae are bud-like? ... or am I way off the mark?
cheers
Leander
-
ABsolutely right. Lamellae are defined as platelike structures even tho' they're usually soft. Papillae vary from round to cone-shaped to elongate protruberances.
-
Wow, that's a beauty, great photo too!
-
It looks very similar to Flabellina poenicia, found from SA around to NSW. There are some details on the species here:
http://www.scuba-equipment-usa.com/marine/..._poenicia).html
I've seen this species a couple of times in Port Stephens, Sydney and Jervis Bay but because its so small it can be difficult to photograph. You have some great pics of it.