On my recent Lembeh trip I shot a lot of the time with +2 and +4 diopters behind my flat port (VX2000/Gates). However this meant that I had no room for the flip filter containing the UR-Pro red filter. I therefore shot without a red filter and just white balanced on my white fin, unless I was using lights.
Looking at the footage now, there is definitely a lot less richness of colour than my normal stuff shot with the filter, even though I was manually white balancing. Below is a typical example. There's also a slightly unpleasant quality to a lot of it, but I can't decide whether it's gain noise, or just not enough depth of colour, or the corners are distorted because of the diopters, or the white grains of sand are over-exposed, or what ![]()
Anyway to combat the situation I've been contemplating using a gel "red" filter between the camera and the first diopter, same as stills guys use on the back of their SLR lenses. I got hold of the leftovers of a friend's Magic Filter, which is an optical quality polyster gel filter. Unfortunately it's not big enough for the job but what I do notice is that the colour is very different indeed from the UR-Pro CY filter. The Magic Filter is much more of an amber colour. Much less pink than the UR-Pro and much more orangey. Almost beige in fact. Alex Mustard chose the colour after extensive trial and error with digital cameras and reckons this one gives the best results after manually white balancing the camera. Read all about it here. So maybe we should be using this colour instead of the UR-Pro CY ![]()
Any thoughts? Has anyone tried a Magic Filter for video, or even compared the results to UR-Pro?
Nick