I am interested in getting a Canon 5D and housing, and need some help choosing the housing.
I use Canon digital cameras topside (EOS 1Ds MarkII) and I want full frame. I'd get a new 5D for this (ultimately two).
In the past I have used (and still have) two Aquatica housings for Nikon N90s film cameras. I have some big manual Ikelite strobes for these. I also had some housings for Nikon SB-24 flashes.
However I haven't taken UW photos for a number of years - I am getting back into it. I have a lot of topside photo experience so I am not a photo newbie.
I am interested in both macro and wide angle. I will probably start with one housing, but ultimately will get two so I can have two bodies - one wide one macro.
Aquatica has a 5D housing, which looks nice. It is probably too much to hope for that the large collection of ports I have for the N90s housings would be compatible.
Pluses of Aquatica seem to be:
- Well made
- Variety of ports available
- Reasonable priced compared to other aluminum housings
- The (expensive) new viewfinder sounds very nice
Minus seem to be:
- Unclear whether it works with E-TTL (see below)
- More expensive than Ikelite
Subal, Nexus, Sea and Sea and others also have 5D housings. Some of them are significantly more expensive than Aquatica. However, other than that I am not sure what their advantages or disadvantages are versus Aquatica. I'm not saying that there is no difference, I just don't know and would appreciate finding out if there is a real advantage or disadvantage.
Ikelite has a polycarb housing for 5D. Pluses there are:
- Much cheaper than an aluminum housing
- Has E-TTL flash connection built in
Minuses seem to be
- Fewer ports
- Lingering doubts about robustness, port flooding etc (what I hear from others)
I do not dive deep, so difference in depth rating between Ike & aluminum housings is not important to me.
I'm aware that the E-TTL flash issue is one of enormous controversy. I have used manual strobes underwater and above, so I am not freaked out by using manual strobes. Indeed that is what I will probably start with. However for macro subjects E-TTL is probably worthwhile.
Nevertheless, it seems a bit weird in 2007 to spend thousands of dollars for a housing that doesn't export the E-TTL features, just in case I want it in the future.
Every time new technology is introduced in photography (autofocus, in camera meters, zoom lenses) it is resisted by photographers. In part that is becaues the early versions never work very well. But over time it really does improve.
So, with that background, I am very interested in the collected wisdom of Wetpixel members on what I should do.
Also, in addition to housings any other advice/comments about gadgets I should get are welcome.