This July I'm taking the Nautilus Explorer from Juneau to Vancouver.
I'm planning on taking my 12-24 and 10.5x lenses for wide angle.
The question is macro. I know that what we think of macro subjects here in S. CA are often huge up Alaska way. I have my 60 mm lens which I will probably bring. The question is bringing the 105 micro. This lens is only good for small subjects and needs it's own, large, port. Will I be missing too many larger subject to count on this lens? I was thinking of maybe using the 17-55. True it only goes to 1:4 closeup but it will capture a lot of small (fist size) to wide angle subjects. Also if the vis. is rely bad the 60 mm is a better lens than the 105 due to it's close working distance.
So the question is bring an extra lens and port (the 105) on top of all the other camera gear and cold water diving gear? Or stick with the 60 mm, 17-55, and 10.5x?
For those that regularly dive BC and surrounding areas which lenses do you usually end up shooting? For information I would prefer shooting wide angle if the vis. and subject matter allow it. Could I get by without the 60 mm lens and it's port?
If I need to bring a flat port I will have the macromate lens to give me 2:1 magnification.
Thanks for any insight. Also any insight on diving Alaska/BC
I was thinking of getting a Panasonic LX2 for topside shirt pocket wide angle. What do you think?