I would like to get some thoughts on which you consider a better lens the 10.5mm or the 10-17mm, I only can afford to buy one or the other i already have to 12-24mm nikon and 60mm.
This is to suit the Nikon D200 in a Nexus housing.
Photography Gear and Technique / Archived topic
Started by downunder ·
Read-only discussion
I would like to get some thoughts on which you consider a better lens the 10.5mm or the 10-17mm, I only can afford to buy one or the other i already have to 12-24mm nikon and 60mm.
This is to suit the Nikon D200 in a Nexus housing.
I would like to get some thoughts on which you consider a better lens the 10.5mm or the 10-17mm, I only can afford to buy one or the other i already have to 12-24mm nikon and 60mm.
This is to suit the Nikon D200 in a Nexus housing.
Get the Tokina 10 - 17 if you can only afford one. For what little decrease in sharpness you might see compared to the Nikon 10.5 the versatility and close focal distance of the Tokina 10 - 17 more than makes up for it. It will probably become your number one lens for non-macro stuff.
Good luck and enjoy.
Andy
![]()
I just used my 10-17 for the first time in Grand Cayman last weekend. Pretty cool lens. I own a 10.5, but probably would not own it if the 10-17 had been available when I bought it. You probably will not use the 12-24 much either once you get it. I think that this lens and my 17-55 will be used 90% of the time underwater. (I am not a big macro person)
My first outing:
http://homepage.mac.com/jeffinorlando/Toki...yman/index.html
Get the Tokina 10 - 17 if you can only afford one. For what little decrease in sharpness you might see compared to the Nikon 10.5 the versatility and close focal distance of the Tokina 10 - 17 more than makes up for it. It will probably become your number one lens for non-macro stuff.Good luck and enjoy.
Andy
I would go with the 10-17.
I'll ring in for the 10.5mm. I've only played with a 10-17mm topside but I have a bit of a soft spot for sharpness and it definitely doesn't 'pop' like the 10.5mm. (Nor would any 3rd party zoom vs. a nikon prime). The close focusing is sweet, but differences in sharpness are magnified UW and I find most pics i've seen a tad soft.
Also, b/c UW photography is so much harder than topside, I personally prefer a prime with the simplicity, direction and 'focus' (forgive the pun) a single focal length gives. Zooming becomes one less thing to worry about in the complex world of UW photography.
Its always a tradeoff - versatility vs image quality. You decide which is more important for your needs.
The 10.5 is a GREAT lens. Truly the digital equivalent of the Nikonos 15 mm lens. Tack sharp. The 10.5 focuses as close as you can get to a subject without scratching your dome.
Terms of Use Privacy Policy Guidelines We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.