Graham
I fully understand you wish to make sure the termination of your association with Indocruises is publicly known. A simply post to that effect is more than enough. Whatever copyright issues you have with Indocruises should be taken up legally. However, I think it is off base to first allude that the Seahorse is badly run by the management (not just my interpretation but also by 2 other readers, which prompted me to post) then say 'issues' means anything or nothing. I suggest you reread what you wrote:
We have had to deal with too many issues regarding management and the way the owners, who with very little diving knowledge want to run their vessel.
Even in your subsequent post, you again insinuate that negative stance about the crew and staff.
I still believe that with the right crew, cruise director and dive staff Seahorse could be the best traditional styled liveaboard in Indonesia! I won't go back on my initial views of the boat. Though for me diving is more about crew, dive staff and quality of diving, not just a fantastic boat!
It is highly irresponsible of you to twice publicly denounce an operation's worthiness without elaboration and proof, especially since you had a partnership with that company, which obviously has gone sour. It can be misinterpreted as vindictive. I'm just taking you to task on this because you are a representative for Indonesia diving. By that fact alone makes you liable for making statements like that, without proof and also hints of malice. Now that Txus has posted his side of this tale, tell me how this has benefitted either one of you?
It may not have been your intention to post negatively, but obviously your choice of words in the subsequent post say otherwise. As a former D4I client, I'm shocked and disappointed you would do this without considering the consequences. Your statements on Indocruises, while obviously valid in your eyes, needs substantiating. You cannot start something like this, then wave your arms and say it's not my 'intention' when your words say otherwise.
What if a client of yours posts here alluding he/she has 'issues' with D4I and state that with better management and staff, D4I would be the best? How would you like that?