Skip to content

Photo / Video Showcase / Archived topic

Who needs the Channel Islands when you have this in your backyard?

Started by drsteve ·

  • 10Posts
  • 10Replies

Read-only discussion

Who needs the Channel Islands when you have this in your backyard?

10 posts
  1. The ocean suddenly decided that summer is here. The water has FINALLY warmed up. It jumped from 54F last week to 63F this week. Best of all, the visibility improved dramatically as well. The inshore diving has been amazingly good. The recently departed cold water provided perfect conditions for the kelp to grow thick and healthy. The fish populations have responded as well. Here are a couple images from Naples reef (0.6 mile off beach in Goleta) yesterday. There was a virtual cornucopia of fish.

     

    On this dive, I baptized my new 5D which was purchased to replace the one that died in a flood a couple of weeks ago. The new camera worked flawlessly. This time I wrapped the port throughly with duct tape to make up for the patented Aquatica "port fall off feature". Canon must love vendors that design housings without port locks.

     

    As usual, click on the image for more details.

     

    Painted Greenling

    622646153_5e93137aa4_o.jpg

     

    Black and Yellow Rockfish

    622645921_ecdb552e9c_o.jpg

  2. Nice shots Steve. It's good to be able to dive close to home.

     

    I'm curious about your unfortunate flooding incident.

    What happened, and how would duct tape keep it from happening again?

  3. Nice shots Steve. It's good to be able to dive close to home.

     

    I'm curious about your unfortunate flooding incident.

    What happened, and how would duct tape keep it from happening again?

    Thanks Herb. Here is the sad story. Since you have an Aquatica housing you probably know most of this, but I will spell it out for those who are not familiar with the Aquatica system.

     

    The day I received my housing a year and half ago, I noticed what I believe is a terrible design flaw. The port connects to the housing using a bayonette mount similar to the system that holds the lens to the camera. However, the camera system works perfectly because it has a simple spring pin to keep it from inadvertently rotating. The Aquatica housing has no such lock. In fact, it has a greased o-ring which turns with VERY little torque. Also the port is large enough that when you sit the camera down on a surface it rests on the edge of the port, which tends to pull it off if it has rotated out of place. This is a recipe for disaster. After using the system for only a couple of months I had a "near" accident in which I was cleaning the system and the macro port fell off. I caught it and no harm was done, but it was clear that I couldn't "just live with it." The solution is to put a nice thick layer of duct tape over the port and extension rings to prevent them from turning accidentally. It looks ugly, but works fine.

     

    A couple of weeks ago, I was on a 2 day trip to the islands and on the second day, I had to remove the duct tape to get into the housing. I forgot to bring an extra roll and dove without reapplying the tape. Sure enough the port fell off in the rinse tank. This reminds me of an old Farside comic which shows a passenger fumbling with his seat controls. Next to the light switch is a button labeled "wings fall off". The Aquatica system essentially has a "port fall off" design. Of course it is my fault for not checking more diligently, but in my opinion, the design is fatally flawed. This is especially frustrating since a simple spring pin that slides into a hole would be cheap and effective.

     

    When I first got the housing, I was very concerned about the lack of a port lock. I called the people at Aquatica and explained my concerns. I spoke with Norma at the Long Beach Scuba show in 2006 and she said that they had designed a port lock and that they would retrofit my housing. I'm still waiting.

     

    I have spoke with other people who have Aquatica housings (and Subal which I believe has a similar problem). Some have similar concerns. Some don't think it is a problem. I think it is probably because the current system relys on the friction of a greased oring to keep the port from rotating out of position. This depends critically on the tolerance stackup of the parts. Some are probably tight enough that they don't tend to accidentally unlock. Others, like mine, turn REAL smoothly, especially with the large moment arm that the dome port provides.

     

    Anyway, the camera was a complete loss. The 17-40mm lens was repaired by Canon for $200. Net cost for this incident is around $3100. Fortunately my home owner's insurance will foot the bill with 0 deductible, but there is a gottcha. I haven't had a claim against my insurance in over 5 years, which means they give me a %15 discount on my policies. This discount will evaporate as soon as my policy renews. It will disappear for the next 5 years. If you add up the lost discount it ends up being like a deductible of $750.

     

    I have been thinking of ways of retrofitting the housing myself to add a spring pin/hole system. This is one of those things that would be trivial to design in, but hard to add after the fact. For now I will be diligent in applying duct tape.

     

    It brings up the question of why such a design issue has persisted so long. Aquatica has made housings for a long time. If you search the boards, you will find that I am not the only one who has been bitten by the lack of a port lock.

    Edited by drsteve
  4. Steve,

     

    Thanks for the info. It looks like there's a large variation on the tightness of fit of the ports. All my ports and extension rings fit very tightly. I remember one time when I try to take it apart by first removing the macro port and then the extension ring, and found that I couldn't rotate the extension ring because it was on so tight. I had to put the macro port back on for leverage to rotate the ring.

    Edited by herbko
  5. Thanks for the info. It looks like there's a large variation on the tightness of fit of the ports. All my ports and extension rings fit very tightly. I remember one time when I try to take it apart by first removing the macro port and then the extension ring, and found that I couldn't rotate the extension ring because it was on so tight. I had to put the macro port back on for leverage to rotate the ring.

     

    The machined parts are probably good to +-0.001", whereas a 4" o-ring typically has a width tolerance of around +-0.003". Therefore the worst case tolerance stackup is around 0.005" (undersized o-ring and oversized groove), which can make a big difference in the o-ring friction. On a 0.070" thick o-ring this is a change in compression of 14%. Assuming that they designed around 30% compression nominal, that might mean that mine is as low as %16, which could also compromise the seal integrity. I haven't had any problem sealing, but I should measure my housing carefully and get exact numbers.

  6. Steve, I don't know if you read my trip report from the 16-17th. Vis. sucked, kelp was falling to pieces, and bottom temps were in the mid 50's. Also, very few fish. That's why I took to photographing the nudi's almost exclusively. Glad you had a good time!

     

    Did you just come back from Yap and Palau?

  7. Steve, I don't know if you read my trip report from the 16-17th. Vis. sucked, kelp was falling to pieces, and bottom temps were in the mid 50's. Also, very few fish. That's why I took to photographing the nudi's almost exclusively. Glad you had a good time!

    I did catch your trip report. I am a little surprised that the Islands weren't nicer. I did beach dives at Tajiguas on Thursday night and at Goleta Beach on Saturday morning. Both had stellar vis (for shore diving). Tajiguas was at least 30ft. Goleta was similar when on top of the pipeline near the end of the pier. At Goleta, the Paradise Dive Club did an underwater cleanup dive to try to rid the pipeline of lost fishing gear. We removed a lot of entanglement hazards such as monofilament, sinkers, lures, etc. I didn't bring the camera, for obvious reasons, but the kelp was so lush, it really was like being out at the islands.

     

    I did a 2 day to the islands on Jun 1-2 when it was still cold. At one site on the back side of Santa Cruz was a brittle star desert. Everything as far as the eye can see was covered with brittle stars. I will post an image later.

     

    Did you just come back from Yap and Palau?

    I wish. Earlier this year we did Socorro. In October we are headed out to the Philippines.

  8. Hope you don't mind me adding these two to your thread, but they were about the only fish we saw. Very wierd? Even the guys with the spear guns weren't bringing up loads.

     

    post-6097-1182828512_thumb.jpg post-6097-1182828551_thumb.jpg

  9. Hope you don't mind me adding these two to your thread, but they were about the only fish we saw.

     

    No problem. The more the merrier. Here are a few more from the same (very productive) dive as the above.

     

    I think this is a juvenile C-O sole. It doesn't have the eponymous C-O pattern on the tail, but otherwise it looks exactly like them.

    627028081_0d54f922d5_o.jpg

     

    Here is the greenest Lingcod I have ever seen. Lingcod make great subjects. They operate on the principle that if they don't move, you can't see them. If you are slow, you can get right in their face.

    627894586_04236ca081_o.jpg

     

    Finally here is a Copper Rockfish looking Magnificent.

    627895404_258ce11e23_o.jpg

  10. I did a 2 day to the islands on Jun 1-2 when it was still cold. At one site on the back side of Santa Cruz was a brittle star desert. Everything as far as the eye can see was covered with brittle stars. I will post an image later.

     

    I posted a thread about the brittle star invasion. It can be found at: http://wetpixel.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=19668

Nauticam

Account

Navigation

Search

Search

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.