I posted a suggestion about image format in the "Galleries" section, in response to the image of an ornate cowfish. Then I thought a bit more, and thought I would ask for opinions. What is the most interesting way to frame a full-face fish?
This is a Scottish two-spot goby:
What works for you?
Tim
B)
I posted a suggestion about image format in the "Galleries" section, in response to the image of an ornate cowfish. Then I thought a bit more, and thought I would ask for opinions. What is the most interesting way to frame a full-face fish?
This is a Scottish two-spot goby:
What works for you?
Tim
B)
The second option works best for me in this case; in the first the little guy gets lost in the image, in the last one his fins are cropped. I can't say this would always be the cas though.
The Last is my favourite, howver the fins being chopped off as loftus says is a teency bit bothersome.
but also as he mentions it would probably differ with each shot you chose
For me #1. It follows more with that stupid rule of the thirds.
Joe
I prefer the second one.
I posted a suggestion about image format in the "Galleries" section, in response to the image of an ornate cowfish. Then I thought a bit more, and thought I would ask for opinions. What is the most interesting way to frame a full-face fish?
I think it depends on the subject (particularly its shape).
With your example, here, Tim, I like the first and second ones best. The third one, with the cropped pectorals doesn't work for me. But in many other cases, vertical is preferred.
Alex
I like the square!
The third (vertical) is a cheat, because I only got one full-face frame in ten minutes of patient (?!) shooting, so I couldn't make a vertical crop without losing the fins.
My suspicion is that a good vertical frame, (with fins!) may be the most eye-catching. I am also interested in how much dark background works: I didn't crop the horizontal because I quite like the simplicity of a "blob on a plain field" because of its abstract appearance.