Well, yes insurance is a good thing BUT,
let's do a littel math:
I am not going to talk about the guru's out there and the pros with $4000 cameras and $5000 strobes.
Let's talk about the middle guys: $500 camera and $500 strobe. Strobes don't flood! Well, they do but not that often so the camera is $500 and that will have to be replaced.
Unfortunately I speak from experience and the fresh water damage on a $500 camera is $350 (yes, I did flooded my canon S40) to be repaired.
So now the littel math: $250 deductible and sbbstract that from $350 and you will have a net huge sum of .... $100. .... Which is what you have to pay for the DAN insurance for the first year.
So if you do let's say 80 dives a year and you take your cameda down in 50 of them, about 30 will be shallow dives, about 10 will be 60-80 ft and the rest of 10 will be 100 - 120 ft when your camera may flood.
Is this worth it?
I don't know.
I am not sure if you guys notice it but the $99 is the first bracket for equipment insurance and I think anything less than $5000 will be insured with $99 a year.
So I say: NO, DAN insurance, as all insurance is NOT good.
Good would be if they would have let's say 5% of what you want to get back to pay per year.
I want to insure my $500 camera for $500 no deductible ... well that would be $25 a year.
I don't want to pay my camera back again in two years!
You guys know that your great 5 MP cameras in 2 years will be on your kid's tables ang you will have probably a 15 - 20 MP camera!
Let's get real, insurance is not that good!
Vlad