Loftus - what kinda birds you shooting w a 70-200 on FF, they in cages?? Are you saying the D7000 AF is far inferior to D700? i kinda guessed that but ya never know with the rate technology filters down, though i suspect they keep it purposefully slower to keep camera models well separated. Or were you just referring to the LV AF???
i was tempted with the $1200 price tag, but i'll wait for the next D300/700 update. I suspect the video/LV AF will be well tweaked by then.
Cheers,
Chris
From a boat; it's not that easy to shoot anything that much longer. 
But last weekend I was in Mosquito Lagoon, north of Cape Canaveral, and it was mostly white pelicans, and other Florida waterbirds, and we could get quite close stalking them from a flats boat. I used the 70-200 and if needed the new Nikon 2x convertor, so equivalent to a 600mm on FX. I used that combination a few months ago in South Africa on my D700 and I was very pleased with both quality and focusing speed and accuracy. I'm referring to the viewfinder AF. I hardly ever even attempt stills with LV, makes no sense for me when I can use a viewfinder.
At least with that combination, yes the D7000 was significantly slower acquiring focus, particularly with moving subjects, some of that may also have been my inexperience using the camera and the different autofocus settings. I will spend some more time with it this weekend. But if you think about it that's what one pays for in the pro bodies, increased responsiveness and durability.
So I am not really knocking the D7000, for general purpose photography it's more fun to drag around than the D700.
I was actually quite pleased with the LV autofocus shooting video, definitely a helpful tool for me particularly because I hate focusing manually on an LCD screen