Some thoughts...
As Herb mentioned, the moving front element precludes the benefit we are used to from add on optics, such as the 67mm threaded Inon UWL-100, Sea&Sea WAL Type L, and Epoque lenses. At the full wide angle setting on the camera, the lens is full extended. It is logical that at this zoom setting, the add on lenses will vignette, since they were at the most designed for a 32mm lens, and this is 28. The lens diameter is also physically larger (I can't measure this, it is internal, but the two cameras side by side it is obvious).
So, I orgininally thought that if you just zoomed in to 32-35mm equivalent, the vignette would disappear. Logical enough, right, since these lenses worked for previous cameras at this focal length. As you move toward telephoto, the lens withdraws into the camera, in effect moving the front of the lens away from the end of the port. This creates the strong vignette at 35mm. If you keep zooming out to telephoto, the lens begins to travel back forward, eliminating the vignette. By this point, however, you have eliminated nearly all of the benefit of the wide angle lens, and its value becomes questionable.
Thie above water wide angle conversion lens that Olympus has built looks, from the specs, to be quite adequate for underwater shooting (19mm equivalent). Sticking it behind a flat port "should" yield unsatisfactory results, however, and I'm confident that these results will begin to surface. If by some miracle of physics the flat port doesn't cause horrible barrel distortion and chromatic aberration, it will at a minimum reduce the benefit of the wide angle conversion by 25%. What focal length eqivalent is it now (which leads me to a rant, why not quote consumer digicam lens specs in FOV degrees?)???
Some manufacturers are not fond of the physical size of the Olympus Wide Angle conversion. At a minimum, it would require mountint the camera in the housing, mounting a port extension to the housing, attaching the lens to the camera, then attaching the dome to the port extension. This leaves a lot of o-ring error possibilites for a system.
This camera does have some improvements over the 5050, but don't get too excited about "less shutter delay". That spec isn't significant, in my opinion. since the AF isn't much faster, and still hunts in low light.
What do I suggest? The addition of Ikelites TTL with REAL UNDERWATER STROBES is pretty cool, and will no doubt steer some coverts that way. Some will also buy into the Olympus system, which isn't that great of a value when all is said and done (how many will actually use that flash topside?, I thought the idea of this thing was to be compact). This camera will do very well with macro, but won't get wide easily.