Recently an UHD premium specifications has come about and there is a lot of confusion about 4K codecs still on the market place, I wrote about it some time ago
https://interceptor121.com/2016/02/07/what-does-uhd-premium-specification-mean-to-4k/
Sony and Panasonic are taking the risk of offering 4K under the requirements of REC709 HDTV whilst 4K will go further beyond very soon
The H264 codec used by both Panasonic and Sony is not great for 4K and actually a 4K stream at 100 mbps does not really capture much more information after all of a good 1080p recording codec.
Resolution is only one of the aspects of what the human eye can see and comes after contrast and colour.
It is expected that HDR provided by premium 4K will bring the most difference to the perceived image quality, far more than colour and resolution
To prove the point I have stressed my Sony RX100 Mark IV for a number of months now on land and recently underwater. I prepared the 4K clip and I showed it to my family on the 55" 4K Tv and they said wow great. However I was only displaying it at 1080p, I then put the display at 4K and nobody could see any difference. This is largely due to the fact that the display size required to see the extra resolution is incredible at 3 meter around 70+ inches.
On my land after much deliberation I am now shooting 1080p as the RX100 with full sensor read out and 50 mbps codec performs well enough and I can't see pretty much no difference at all with 4K even at close distance. This is of course not true for many cameras that do not resolve the full 1080p anyway.
It is likely that it will take a couple of years to define the disputes around 4K and get into real benefits. Furthermore most of the displays do not support HDR anyway
So if you like me have a normal 55/60" TV and watch it at 10 feet 3 meters and the TV does not have HDR you will not be able to see any benefits of any sort.
Only watching on a computer monitor will show the extra pixels