I've been shooting the Z9 for 25 dives now, and I'm starting to get used to it. I'm coming from a D850, and a D810 before that, all housed by Nauticam.
My experience with the DSLR's was with the 16-35vr and the 105vr. Plus two dives with the 60mm macro. And a few with a TC on the 105.
Compared to the D850, I find the experience mostly similar, comfortably so. The viewfinder is annoying, but other than that it seems to get out of my way. Might be different on a night dive, but I don't do night dives. It's annoying because it constantly goes off when I'm not shooting for a while (a good thing to save battery), but then I have to remember to thumb the AFON lever to wake up the viewfinder before I get it to my eye. Obviously never had to do that with the DSLRs, so it's added a lever press to my in-water workflow every time I raise the camera. I guess the in-viewfinder review is nice, but I do have to press a lever to do the review, whereas my old workflow was just to glance at the monitor on the back.
Autofocus: I used 3d Tracking on the D850, and it was wonderful. I use 3d Tracking on the Z9 and it is wonderful. I think the D850 might have a slight edge on tiny, close, dimly-lit stuff like Wire Shrimp, but giving a bit of focus light help, the Z9 does as well. Subject tracking - [I'm smiling as I think what to say] - sometimes gives interesting results. I was amused when it focused on the nostrils of a Green Moray Eel instead of the eyes. It does OK at picking things out of the water like a barracuda swimming by, but it clearly isn't recognizing any kind of animal subjects. So, stick with 3d tracking, and do some trickery with the viewfinder to help autofocus in dim lighting. (Turn up sharpening, AF on Z9 uses viewfinder feed...) I do focus-and-recompose for the most part, and the edge-to-edge ability for the Z9 is welcome and useful.
The Z9 files seem just better on two fronts - white balance and higher ISO colors. Perhaps two sides of the same coin. First, I got a lot of underwater shots that were credible out of camera, using Auto white balance down to maybe 50 feet. Not correct white balance, but a lot better than the murky green I used to see. I shoot RAW and color balance stills in post, but I was pleasantly surprised to see a lot of images start out close. And colors seemed hold up better at high ISOs also. (Than either D810 or D850 files).
Lenses - clear win for mirrorless here, compared to what I was shooting, The 105s is sharper than the 105vr, and the vr was no slouch. As for how they feel in the water, pretty much exactly the same. The 14-30 also seems clearly sharper than the 16-35. I'm shooting both of them with Sea and Sea Internal Correction Lenses behind the same 230mm dome. 90mm extension on the DSLRs, 50mm on the Z9. I did have an issue with the 14-30 on one dive refusing to work, showing a F___ error. After the dive I removed the camera from the housing, removed the lens and wiped the lens contacts with th.e bit of towel to rub off oxidation. That worked and the lens resumed working. (The contacts did look dirty.)
The 14-30 is very sharp in the center, and acceptable on the edges. I shot it mostly around F8-F14.
I haven't even gotten to video yet. Had a lot to get used to get comfortable with new gear. Plus had a fiber cable break today - used the spare.
The extremely brief bit of video I have done with the Z9 is easily superior to the DSLRs. Autofocus actually works during video. I can shoot at 4k120p for cropping and slow motion. Or 8k raw. Night and day difference, most of which I don't understand.
Handling-wise, the Z9/Nauticam is pretty pleasant to work with. All the buttons and knobs you need are conveniently at finger, except changing ISO values. That is a pain that has me reaching left hand off the left grip to turn a knob over on the right side. (Same with D850). The Z9 does have 4 Function buttons that are all conveniently accessible. That opens up a lot of possibilities.