24 minutes ago, stillviking said:
Hello ChrisRoss, I just do some snorkeling with my surf housing and have the opportunity to shoot some mantas and trying to find a whale shark soon! Yes, my question is what lens to choise for this Canon R + Liquideye + 6.5'' Dome setup.
My Canon 14-35 f4L had poor results probably because dome is too small, as you comment. Corners were totally out of detail. Maybe I should invest in a 8'' and RF 16 mm because I like the image to be rectilinear or use Sigma 15 mm and edit on Lightroom with corner distorcion?
Any other suggestion?
The 16mm would be no different to the 14-35 zoomed in to 16mm in the same dome, SO I think those are your two choices, fisheye with existing dome or something like the 16mm with a bigger dome. Even with a 230mm dome corners will still be a little soft with a 16mm lens and people generally stop down to f11-13 for better corner performance. It's a characteristic of dome ports unfortunately.
The 15mm fisheye will be quite sharp in your existing setup, a lot of people use fisheyes in UW work, they can be made to work as long as you don't place anything important in the corners and don't include straight lines in the composition, you do need to be very close though. You can de-fish but there is no free lunch and the corners may still suffer a little in the de-fished image.
You will probably find the 16mm in a large dome works OK for many things where you don't have important detail in the corners - like large pelagics like mantas with water in the corners.