22 hours ago, Arianna Skipper said:
Currently shoot topside with a Sony a7r4a and UW with a Nikon D500 Aquatica rig. Looking to migrate fully to Sony-- I can't justify working with two different sets of lenses, gear, etc. Not sure if I should house the a7r4 I've got now or wait out the next generation of releases from Sony (likely 2024), or perhaps even house the a1 once I get my hands on it. Bringing an a1 underwater makes me a little nervous, even though I've never had a flooding issue with Aquatica.
A frustration I currently have with my Nikon are the limited video capabilities. The a7r4 has good video capabilities, but I haven't really explored editing log files from that camera yet. I guess my question is-- should I house the a7r4 or the a1? Or a third option altogether? Just interested in what others think! Thanks!
Hi Arianna,
I would not house the A7RIV. The housing costs more than the camera and the camera has been already replaced by the A7RV that sems to perform clearly better UW. You have, at present, everything you need. Of course one should switch to one system if possible, but you have time and can be patient until the time is ripe...
You need to decide whether you want to use FF or APS-C for underwater: for APS-C, neither Sony nor Nikon have, at present, modern models that makes the acquisition of camera plus housing attractive. For FF one could switch to Sony A1 (when video is important) or A7RV (photocentric). Nikon has Z9 (but this camera needs a very big housing!). If I were you, I would wait for the next generation of cameras and then decide which system I would continue to use...
In case you cannot effort to loose many thousands of $ because of flooding, you can make a contract with an insurance company (this is what I do)...
Wolfgang