7 minutes ago, Alex_Mustard said:
I am concerned about the idea of using the teleconverter not next to the lens - as designed - but with the adaptor between the TC and the lens - which surely will impact on performance. Although again, not sure for the good or bad, I fear the latter.
A long telephoto lens (I have both the Sony 100-400 GM and the 200-600 G as you saw yesterday). Has a cavity in the lens where the rear element moves when the lens zooms
The native teleconverter is designed to fill this gap and the front element of the tc protrudes accordingly
The adapter between RF and EF mount is 26mm thick but the teleconverter will not protrude that much
This means that, if the front element of the teleconverter is not long enough it will be further away from the rear of the master lens when passing through the adapter.
This will result in an extension tube effect. The lens may potentially loose infinity focus on land, but underwater this is not an issue as behind a dome there is no infinity. However the reported f/stop is incorrect and the teleconverter lens combination will vignette more
this means that instead of 10.7mm for 15mm you are looking perhaps at 11-11.5 mm to get 15mm and ultimately the range will not be 15-21 but something like 15-20mm
It is not possible to comment on the image quality and it is not necessary a better or worse solution but it is not a recommended solution
From my analysis I see no major deterioration of the lens in terms of chromatic aberration especially because we use lenses stopped down to f/8 or smaller anyway