I'm going to get an Olympus TG-6 mostly for shooting nudibranchs, but also to document other fun Big Island dives, possibly including a blackwater dive. Generally for macro, and photography (not video).
I am trying to decide between a strobe—probably the Backscatter MF-2—and a pair of video lights. I've seen a lot of general posts saying that strobes are better, but I'm not sure here.
1. The TG-6's minimum aperture at wide angle is only f/2.8 and zoomed in only something like f/4 (I don't have the exact number right now). Closing the aperture beyond is pointless since it is faked with a neutral density density filter; you don't get more depth of field. This, plus I'm doing macro photography (and nudibranchs don't move fast), I think means the TG-6 doesn't need a super strong light to get decent shutter speeds.
2. I can buy two cheap video lights for less than the price of one MF-2. My budget doesn't allow for two strobes. So I get more lighting flexibility with video lights. Plus easier light placement and focus acquisition. I'm not so worried about nudibranchs running away from the light.
Conventional wisdom says to buy the strobe, but I don't really understand the advantage. What am I missing?