Jump to content

RobinD

Members
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Country

    Netherlands
  1. in one of the last shows of the underwater photography show, Alex and Matthew talked about this lens: Probably nice if you shoot 105 often, but at times you wished you brought a 60 macro for slightly bigger stuff.
  2. I wonder if a smaller focus point, free floating in the ocean with a moving subject, would make my life easier or harder 😄
  3. I dont know much about video, but for photo, having a good enhanced viewfinder will make your shooting a lot easier and more fun.
  4. tnx for the report John, could you please tell your experience with the autofocus system of the Z8, compared to the D500? And what housing did you choose for the Z8?
  5. I doubt the one testshot I made is very usefull for a fair comparisment. There is difference in composition, distance and perhaps exact point of focus. Anyway here is the centre shot, same settings, left MFO right no MFO
  6. on my first dive with the mfo I took a picture with and without the mfo, just to try. Free floating in drysuit in a silty lake in the Netherlands, so a little shift in position. This shot is from a 105 macro (AF-S 105mm F/2.8G IF-ED VR) in the bottom corner on fullframe DSLR. No sharpening, removal of CA etc. F16 1/60 iso 100. In the centre the difference is still there, but less noticable. Left mfo, right no mfo
  7. very nice, thanks for sharing!
  8. in air, my MFO on a 105, can only focus up to +/- 30 cm in front of my port, anything beyond it wont focus. In water, its up to +/- 100 cm (like on the nauticam port chart). So i do believe, water has a big impact in how this lens works, although I dont know how it affects image quality. I would not use the mfo without water between port and wetlens.
  9. RobinD posted a post in a topic in General Chat
    im using Panasonic BQ-CC55 chargers. I did have one or two dead batteries a long time ago, but not in recent years. I allways travel with a few extra batteries. I do try to keep the eneloops bundled in pairs of 4, Never had issues like in your pictures myself
  10. onderwaterhuis.nl shows the mfo at 449 EUR edit oops thats what you said 🤫
  11. Hi all! what routine do you follow for drying your ports and water contact optics in between dives? One of my old macro ports is hammered with water stains / glass corosion, I nowdays try to avoid water from drying on to my ports. However, I wonder how other photograghers handle this issue, if they dry their ports and if so, with what (towell, paper, micro fiber etc) like to hear! greetings Robin
  12. I did try the MFO with a 60 mm macro, it works nice on pretty close subjects, but it starts to vignet (badly) at subjects at a little more distance. I guess this will make it not so usefull on even wider lenses, although i havent tried it.
  13. I do use the diffusers, the green water here is full of sediment, I use the white diffusers here. When i go to tropical diving, I plan to get the wide angle diffusers, for the little color shift. I also use reduction rings, that also stay on when transporting the strobes. I dont use bumpers / neoprene covers. Didnt try the reflectors myself, might look into that at some point 😁
  14. MFO stands for Mid-range focus optimizer (according to Nauticam) 😁

Important Information

Terms of Use Privacy Policy Guidelines We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.