Jump to content

stillviking

Members
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Country

    Portugal
  1. They say phones and AI will kill photography, but what I see is each year more units are sold!!
  2. I would be really surprised if not a RF-S lens! 14-35 f4L killer?
  3. Hello people Newest Canon RF 20mm 1.4 L is the astrophotography photographers dream, super sharp, but I was thinking if it would be a good option underwater? Anyone tried it? Cheers!
  4. Yes :(! Unfortunately it's little "old school" no AF this days...
  5. Hello, New launch, could be interesting for Canon RF users since we don't have a native RF fisheye lens. Min. focus = 16 cm. Price: $699. Laowa 8-15mm f/2.8 FF Zoom Fisheye is a full-frame lens designed for photographers and content creators seeking bold, creative perspectives. It delivers a dual fisheye effect with a versatile zoom range and an ultra-fast f/2.8 aperture, guaranteeing a jaw-dropping visual style for stunning imagery. An unparalleled flexibility is provided to vloggers, content creators, and photographers for capturing expansive landscapes, compact cities, action sports, and 360° panoramas. Mount: Sony E / Nikon Z / Canon RF / L Mount
  6. In fact, this new Canon RF lens retracts when zooming from 16mm to 28mm. At 16mm:
  7. I've never tested, but I've read that this new Canon 16-28 2.8 is shaper than the Canon 15-35 2.8 L and new Canon 28-70 2.8 is shaper than Canon 24-70 2.8. Can this be possible? I would love to someone test it underwater, even if we just use it at 16 mm!
  8. Hello people, the new Canon RF 16-28 mm 2.8 is small (99.1 mm), light and reviews says it is very sharp. Minimum focus distance is just 0.20 m (vs Canon RF 15-35 mm 2.8 that is 0.28 m). What do you guys think of it underwater? Anyone tried? I'm curious about this new setup (since Canon doesn't have a new RF fisheye yet). Cheers!
  9. Cool report! Snorkeling with the tigers not possible, right?
  10. Wow I would just poo myself being there without a cage.
  11. Sure! =D Being on topic, I would ask about RF 24mm macro what would be minimum dome to work good on corners? I also never thought about this particular lens to underwater photography.
  12. I would just add latest Canon RF 16mm 2.8 to discussion.
  13. Welcome @ColdDarkDiver!! I see you bought Canon RF 14-35 mm f4 > Canon RF 16 mm f2.8 > Canon EF 8-15 mm! What's your feedback after all this time, what are you using? 😄
  14. I see, but Ikelite chart has a smaller dome model for RF 16 mm 2.8 as option 1 that is 6" size (however name is 8" compact). null

Important Information

Terms of Use Privacy Policy Guidelines We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.