
Posts posted by TimG
-
-
-
-
-
-
A bit like Chris, I don’t spend a lot of time.
I use LR with a standard home made preset to adjust Contrast, Dehaze and a couple of other settings on Import.
Then a relatively quick look through each image at the end of the day, select those that are worth work (maybe a dozen a dive), those to delete (the majority!), and those worth keeping for maybe work at a later date - another dozen.
I then do some work on the chosen dozen to tweak levels, maybe play with Masks to enhance the subject, and maybe a bit of backscatter removal. Perhaps 3-4 mins a picture in total.
And that’s pretty much done. Following day a quick review, delete more images and probably keep a total of around 10 from a dive. If it’s a 3 dive day, I’ll probably keep 20-30 images in total. Often much less.
I think the key is a quick triage and only select what is really good for a serious edit. Park or delete the rest.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1 hour ago, Chris Ross said:
t's also of course only a potential problem if you fly with a port mounted to the housing. For packing I often have the plastic cover on front rather than a port and I can do what I like as the housing won't hold a vacuum - o-ring or no o-ring.
Totally agree with Chris on this
-
If you fly there is a good chance that the pressure differential can cause problems when back on the ground getting, for example, the port off the housing. You do need to be careful.
I do fly with o-rings in place but because I have a vacuum sensor, it is easy to "bleed" the system if there is a problem with the valve allowing pressures to be equalised.
I do remember having a problem some years back - pre-vacuum valve - where I had the devil's own job getting a port off a housing when I had flown with the port in place on the housing.
-
-
Hi RVBldr
Yeah, never easy to start with.
A couple of thoughts: my understanding was that the Marleux had quite a sophisticated focus light and aiming system? So was the snoot aiming light on the right place but when you took the image, the strobe was not hitting where you thought?
Snoots do/can have a sweet spot for focussing the beam. Does the manual give an indication of this?
The images look underexposed to me which is not unusual for starting off with a snoot. I found in my early snoot days that this was sometimes the reason that I thought the snoot was not aimed right! Might be worth increasing the strobe output a click or two.
If you've not seen it already, quite a useful article here:
-
-
Hello from Arizona
in Member Introductions
Hi rayhendricks! Welcome to Waterpixels. Great to have you with us.