jjmochi

Hmm I only have ~30k photos in my catalogue. But my previews file is 66gb. I guess it's mostly from the smart preview files.

Thanks Chris. I have 2 computers - MacBook Pro which I prefer (better screen, easier workflow, can edit on trips etc) and a windows desktop at home (gaming desktop, should be very powerful but for some reason LR/PS is not much faster). I just got Backscatter xterminator and it was quite slow on my laptop hence I was playing around with swapping the catalog over to my desktop for hopefully faster edit. I've now discovered that every time I run backscatter xterminator, PS turns a 80mb ARW file into a 1.3GB TIF file! Surely that can't be right? How large are your tif files? I think I get what you mean - it's similar to what I'm doing except the master catalog lives on my laptop instead of the external hard drive. I went through and deleted all my old backups - for reason my current catalog lived in one of the backup folders, took a while to sort out but now I got back ~30gb... Deleted all my old full size jpeg exports which already went into iCloud Photos and got back another 40gb...

Hi I'm using a Macbook Pro with 1TB of internal storage. I don't have much movies or other stuff on it. Currently my workflow is to upload all the photos from a trip into LR, delete any not in focus/bad photos, end up with ~1000 raw files for a 1 week trip that I want to keep. From that 1000 I then pick ~200 to edit and export. Once I'm done editing the 200 photos from that trip I build smart previews for all 1000 photos, and move the original raw files for all 1000 into an external hard drive, keeping only the smart previews on my internal storage. So this has worked well for me when I had my A7C but is becoming a problem after a few trips with my A7R5 due to the sheer size of the files. I have ~20 trips worth of smart previews on my laptop + 1-2 trips of original raw files (=160GB) + 2000 raw files of my baby (=90GB) that I haven't gotten to editing yet and it's running out of storage. The raw files only add up to 250GB. Lightroom folder itself is 100GB. Everything is in one catalog and it has backups going to 2022. The problem is I cannot find where the 100GB is coming from, each file I can see is only maybe 0.5GB at most. It's also gotten quite slow but I don't know where the bloat is? Is there a more efficient way of doing this? Should I be creating separate catalogues for each trip (I do like having everything in one place tho)? How do I go about cleaning this up? Thanks!

Hi all, I'm looking to upgrade my first and only pair of strobes, a set of Z330s. With the Retra Pro Max II about to come out, if any existing owners of the original Pro Max is looking for an excuse to upgrade, let me know! Price difference between Pro Max vs Pro Max II is only $170 on Retra website so I am looking for a meaningful discount on the original Pro Max, otherwise I would just pay a bit more and get the Pro Max II directly. Also looking for an Retra LSD snoot + a Sony flash trigger for Nauticam housing that can do HSS. I am based in Singapore but my parents are in Canada (for NA sellers) and my husband also go on frequent work trips to Germany (for EU sellers) so can arrange delivery for either of the 2 also if easier. Thanks!

Thanks all! Managed to get my hands on a metabones v5 and it works. Was able to reuse my 30mm N100 extension from WACP setup. So it's 30mm extension > N120 adapter > 25mm N120 extension > 140mm glass dome. My camera guy was able to 3D print me a zoom gear which lines up nicely with the N120 adapter zoom knob.

So I went to buy the Sony 2X TC and the Canon 8-15 today, and it does NOT fit with my metabones. The protruding part of the Sony TC cannot fit into the metabones. I think i have the mk4 and have to track down a mk5

Ahh ok thank you! They don't have the pro version here it seems. And shipping from the US would not be much cheaper. So Sony it is! Can you link me to the 3D parts? I'm not sure where to look. So this means if I go Housing > N100-120 adapter > 60mm extension > 140mm glass dome, I can use the Nauticam zoom gear as is but turning it with the knob on the adapter? But is that accounting for metabones or for native canon? It seems the Sony TC is 40mm so may not line up nicely if I put my existing 30mm N100 extension in front of the N100-120 adapter.

Thanks everyone and apologies for the belated reply. I spent a week after my Halmahera trip diving Lembeh and just got back home 2 weeks ago, and am now finally starting to process/look through the photos from the trip. So upon a bit of deliberation I think my top priority is to get wider reach than WACP-C but still maintaining most of the range. The narrower end I rarely have any great keepers from, it's more hey I saw a Denise pygmy on a WACP-C dive and can get a decent image to remember I saw it. Weight and IQ are second order considerations. Cost is a third order consideration. So with all of the above feedback I am now debating between 1) 8-15mm w 2x TC, vs 2) FCP For 2x TC, is there consensus on whether the Sony vs the new kenko is better? Looking through the linked threads it seems people have had good results with both. I am leaning towards Sony since I figure I can also use it with my 100-400mm Sony GM lens on safari (which is my next trip). First, are these the right models? Sony being almost 3x $ the Kenko? Kenko https://www.cathayphoto.com.sg/photo-video-accessories/lens-accessories/kenko-teleplus-hd-2x-dgx-teleconverter-for-canon-ef?srsltid=AfmBOopZSBgVI8ij29OVpu6QfMHCts-RfpVsjWH0zgVW5uYvOhuE5KCg Sony https://www.cathayphoto.com.sg/cameras/lenses/sony-fe-2x-teleconverter Would the correct set up be A7R5 > Sony TC > Metabones > Canon 8-15? Vs A7R5 > metabones > Kenko TC > Canon 8-15? but kenko TC (since it specifies for Canon EF) being unable to use w Sony 100-400? For the dome, I see 140mm glass dome but also a reference to Zen 100. The 2 seems to be around the same price. Is the advantage of the ZEN only weight? At the cost of slightly better IQ of the 140mm glass dome? Lastly, would the extension needed be N100-120 adapter + 30mm extension? I'm unsure whether the zoom gear will work since the 8-15 will be behind at minimum a TC and maybe a TC+metabones? And can I reuse my existing 30mm N100 extension that I'm using with the WACP-C? So would it be housing > 30mm N100 extension > N100-120 adapter > 140mm glass dome? I'm actually not super concerned about IQ. So just trying to work out exact set up for 8-15mm so I can make a comparison of cost/weight against FCP. Seems like the 8-15mm set up will be ~3k cheaper and 1.5kg lighter. I also want to get the new SMC-3 and MFO-1 as well as a used EMWL so if I'm only losing the 68-85 degree range with the 8-15 vs FCP and IQ is pretty comparable I think the choice is clear.

Hi all As always, every time I go on another dive trip, I find the urge to change something in my setup. I currently shoot w Sony A7R5 in Nautical housing - for wide angle I use the kit 28-60mm lens w Nautical WACP-C. I am mostly very happy but find myself constantly struggling with the weight and going over the 10kg hand carry limit (w only WACP-C, camera, lenses, macro port, and SMC-1). On my current trip to Halmahera I also found it not wide enough to capture the big schools of barracuda and jacks in Tifore - cannot get close enough for strobes to light while still capturing the full ball in the frame. I previously used the 28-60mm w WWL-1B, and before that with the MWL-1, and before that had a Nikon APS-C which I used w Tokina 10-17mm and 4.33m mini dome. I find myself missing the 150 degree effect fov of the MWL-1 and the Tokina, and really miss the light weight of the Tokina set up. I sold the MWL-1 because I wasn't happy w the image quality, everything had a distorted feel to it especially in the corners. So upon doing some research, I have stumbled upon the Canon 8-15mm fisheye in either 140mm glass dome or the 4.33" mini dome as another option. I already have the metabones V adapter and the 30mm extension, so would need to buy the lens, N100-120 port adapter, new zoom ring, and one of the domes. On the other hand I can sell my 28-60, the zoom ring, and the WACP-C -> so net net I don't think it will be a big cash outlay. I have a few questions: 1) will changing to this be a dent on image quality? 2) is the mini dome viable and a decent option? Primary consideration is the weight savings. However I do see the 140mm glass dome recommended more. 3) what is the equivalent field of view at the 15mm end? can I still get normal rectilinear wide angle shots? I know the 8mm end is a full circular fish eye. 4) anything else I should consider? Many thanks!

Hi all I’ve been tempted by the EMWL for a while and recently found someone selling a second hand set w the 100 degree objective. I shoot a Sony A7R5 w the standard 90mm macro and the Nauticam 40 degree VF. The A7R5 has the ability to invert the LCD but not the viewfinder. I’m struggling to decide: 1) whether I really need the relay lens or not? I can shoot w camera inverted LCD and save some money on the relay. But I can’t seem to find much info on using it this way. Or with the EVF can you ever get used to shooting it upside down? 2) should I save on the second hand 100 or go straight for a new 160? If money is not a consideration my preference would be the 160. But the 160 is $2000+ more than the second hand 100 and I find myself going back and forth between just splurging for the 160 and thinking the 100 would be good enough. Does anyone have both and can comment on their experience? thanks!

Thank you all for your thoughts! I must admit I forgot I posted this until my next dive trip and am currently going through the sorting/editing process again. A lot to think about and definitely makes sense to have different curation for different audience and purposes.

Hi, I'm not sure if this topic belongs here, but I'm curious how folks "curate" a portfolio. I usually end up with 1000-ish decent photos (in focus, ok lighting, something of interest) from a one week dive trip (4 dives/day, 24-28 dives total) that I will keep for my own records to remember what I saw. From that 1000-ish photos I can generally pick ~150-200 photos that I like better than the rest (composed well, lit well, interesting critter) which I then post online and share with family and friends. Where I struggle is to cut that down even further to say the best 20 photos - my husband often complains that 200 is too many to go through and it would be better and more impactful if I can narrow it down to just a handful. I don't know whether to pick the rarest critters (wonderpus, blue ring, etc) or the best photos (and how do you judge that - there are images that I really like that / was really hard to get (snooted with SMC in current for example) which my husband was unimpressed by, and others that he like that I thought was quite ordinary). I would like to print some shots for my house, or print one of those photo books as a dive log, and curious how others narrow down their best shots. My Flickr albums are here if helpful to refer to specific examples: https://www.flickr.com/photos/184457560@N06/albums/ Thanks!

Camera is sold but housing still available! Price negotiable

Wow! I feel special!

Selling a 1 year old A7C with Nauticam housing. Camera body is in perfect condition and looks brand new. Housing has been through 8 trips and ~150 dives, never flooded, in perfect working condition but does have some minor cosmetic fading of the paint. Selling as am upgrading to A7R5. Camera for $1200 Housing for $2500 Get both for $200 less = $3500 (a new Nauticam housing alone will run you close to $3300!) I'm based in Singapore - can meet locally or ship internationally at buyer's cost.IMG_38 IMG_3849.HEIC IMG_3850.HEIC IMG_3851.HEIC IMG_3852.HEIC IMG_3853.HEIC