Hmmnn....
I guess that air-integration, especially hoseless, uses more power, so perhaps it's not the best solution to the problem of the computer that goes "belly-up" on a dive. I don't see the benefit of air consumption calculation in the water, because that should have been done at the planning stage, and using the "rule of thirds" in the water makes it unnecessary. Do divers with air-integration tend to push the limits of air consumption too far?
I had a Cochran Commander that I binned after a peculiar failure: power was good, but on one dive it just kept piling on deco. up to a 4-hour stop! When I downloaded the data it showed that every tissue compartment had been FULL of nitrogen at the START of the dive, despite a no-stop dive 12 hours before.
I suspect that some models of computer have glitches in the way that power fluctuation affects the sensor readings or the data registration.
The dive operators at Bikini atoll have experience with a range of computers that have been pushed towards their limits. they recommend DiveRite computers (so I have a VR3, now; I don't follow advice!).
Tim
B)