Hi Jules,
The old debate: SCR vs CCR. 
There are lots of rumors that originate from people that don't have a clue about CCR diving. BTW. It is really an OLD debate. For technical rebreather diving, the tool of choice these days tends to be a CCR, not a SCR. The current debate is more ECCR vs MCCR.
I bought an Inspiration (CCR) and I'm very glad I did. Why?
Gas management is still an issue with a SCR. It isn't with a CCR, unless you have a leak somewhere or you breath out via the nose. (very bad CCR practice). I even removed the gauges from my onboard tanks. My average consumption per hour is 25 bar of O2 (independent of depth) and around 30 bar of diluent (depends a bit on depth) out of 3 liter tanks. That is only 75 liter per hour!!! This will be much higher on SCR.
Other aspects that go against an SCR:
* bubbles
* no constant PPO2
* much higher gas use
* you have to choose your gasses for the depth planned
* longer deco times
* becomes much more complex if you go deeper (multiple gasses, gas switches). On CCR you stay on your bottom gas, without switching to travel gasses or deco gasses. The only variable is the percentage of O2 in the mix.
* not optimal for multi-level dives
* WOB (work of breath) tends to be higher
* An SCR can kill you as easily as a CCR
If I had to start again, I would again go for the Inspiration (ECCR) but I would also consider a Copis Meg (MCCR).
An ECCR is an electronically controlled CCR. An MCCR is a closed circuit rebreather with a constant O2 flow just below the diver's oxygen metabolism rate. The diver has to add oxigen manually (once every 15 minutes or so) to make up for the difference. An ECCR does everything automatically.
Let me know if you have specific questions. If you need feedback on SCR vs CCR, you could also post your question on www.rebreatherworld.com.
Peter