What is the consensus of the 4/3 format? The sensor is physically smaller than other cameras, but there seems to be a logic around the technology. BUt I have to admit I like the aspect ratio of 35mm format/HD widescreen aspect ratio more than the 4/3 formats aspect ratio.
I'm trying to determine a setup to freedive with - looking at the E520 or similar with a housing/domeport and as wide a lens as I can get for shooting freedivers, pelagics, etc while freediving. A friend/client has suggested the new Sea & Sea housing coming out for the Canon Xsi - I've been out of the loop on the stills end of things for quite some time and it seems as though these cameras change every 9 months and feel confused as to why when anything above 8MP is 35mm resolution - this info coming from a commercial shooter I know here locally.
What's the difference? Any thoughts?
Well the 4/3 standard has been out quite awhile. You can go here for more information www.fourthirdsphoto.com I could rave about the camera but it would just be an op-ed piece. Canon and Nikon make very competitive entry level cameras. As a freediver I think size would be your main concern. I could be wrong but I've only seen compact housings for Canon and Olympus. Olympus's OEM housing is rather compact and light. I've seen the xti in a small metal housing that got raves from those with small hands because the housing was very compact. Unfortunately I can't remember the manufacturer of that housing.