I'm hoping for some guidance as I am wanting to change into some new technology but am confusing myself and being terribly wishy-washy. I'm trying to be brief but it might drag a bit, sorry! I know that there are multiple great options and it's individual for "best", but getting some real world input may help me clarify my own thinking. I have been using dslr for over a decade, though the past year + I was only using my Oly TG series. That's been great fun, but the limitations and image quality for some types of images were starting to annoy & drain some of the fun for me so I brought the big rig out of the closet last month. My BGC is currently Canon 7dmkii and Nauticam with Inon 240s. I have a bunch of lenses & domes/ports & dioptres for macro; I also have the Kraken KRL-90S that I think I remember having fun using, but it's been a long while. Ideally, I'd like to be able to use what I currently have with the new system with an eye on updating components as needed, so am fairly confident I'd l like to stay Canon/Nauticam. My shooting style is often wandering around the dive and taking whatever comes, versus setting out with more specific goals. My 17-70 macro lens offers great flexibility for those days; other days I enjoy the Tokina 10-17 and Canon 60 macro. I have an older Canon 100 macro and I think that is one lens I may want to update to the RF version eventually, but for now, will hopefully be able to limp along with it. Going forward, I'd like to explore shooting video & wider scenes as these are things I haven't pursued as much. A friend let me borrow her Canon R5, but sadly I wasn't able to get it underwater as conditions were yucko. I may have another chance soon, though. I was able to see which of my lenses worked with it, so that was nice and all but the 60 played nicely. It was my first time using mirrorless and I liked it. At first I was ready to make the jump to FF, but now I'm back to not being sure if that matters so much to me; I don't think I have a strong preference either way, though when I used the R5 on land, I did miss my "extra" reach! Seems FF is more expensive, too. I have considered everything in Canon's range, but keep flip flopping. I think the Final Four are R50 (backscatter suggested this set up and it was very tempting; love the form factor), R7, R6mkii and R5mkii. I don't think any would let me down for image quality, but I get a bit lost trying to pinpoint how much benefit I would get from moving up the chain. And, it sounds like there are new models coming later this year so maybe I should keep waiting; I don't have to have it right now, though I kinda would like it before our summer diving starts in Nov/Dec! What I want is probably what everyone else wants: excellent autofocus for both stills and video; great video - I am starting to explore this and would hate to get a body now that is too limiting (and I think I read that was an R50 issue) because changing bodies when housings are involved is just painful imho. I'm a happy cropper - I do try to get the image I want, of course, but sometimes I like/need to crop. While the R5mkii is undoubtedly an awesome machine, I do feel that choosing something else would do me just as well and any difference in costs would be put to good use on trips, lighting, lenses that would benefit me more. Whew, is that too much info? Have I given enough info to help me narrow my choices? I hope so...i seem to be able to talk myself into anything but then fall down the rabbit hole and don't end up making a decision. I'd love to hear your thoughts. Adding a photo so this post at least has something fun to look at!