My style is like Canuck in that I get the camera focused early and then move in, taking shots continuously. I set my D200 to focus priority so it won't fire when not in focus. I use a single center focus point and don't worry about repositioning the camera. I simply crop later. This way I usually get multiple shots of skittish critters from varying distances, usually with the eye well focused.
When I spot the critter I set my F/stop and place the strobe accordingly based on what I consider the perfect shooting distance. Then I try to move in. I tend to keep my single DS-125 well out to the side ( 2-8" arms) to provide a wide angle of strobe coverage. The Ds-125 is using Ikelite iTTL which appears very accurate for macro. The Ds-125 also recycles quite quickly which allows me to click off a huge number of shots as I move in.
In summary, I am trying to get lucky. I am hoping that one of the zillion shots I take (all with the same strobe angle, F/stop and shutter but NOT the same camera position) will turn out to rival professional shots. Naturally, if I get to the proper distance an position and the critter is still there I will vary everything just like a professional. However, that usually only happens with Flamingo Tongues (;
If the light is very poor I simply turn on the Ds-125's targeting light. Typically the D200 won't get a focus lock in very low light until the edge of the targeting light lights the subject.
The advantage of this approach, as Canuck says, it that I will usually get SOME picture of the critter with the eye in focus though not maybe the perfect picture. I think a lot of one's personal shooting style depends on what constitutes a great picture. I am an amateur. If I took my best shots (The ones where I got lucky) and placed them in a collection with a professional like Alex, my pictures would belong but they would not be among the best pictures in that collection. Alex's best would always be better than my best.
Another variable not usually discussed is how do you intend to display your shots? In my case I either print on an Epson R2400 or display them on a Panasonic 65"1080P plasma. (I have a 1080P screen for my computer) Very different pictures work for the different media. The flatscreen displays billions of colors at 2K by 1K pixels. The color depth makes relatively complicated backgrounds quite pleasing. Not so on the printer. Single subjects with black or dark blue backgrounds look best.
Someone who shoots for a magazine or for a web-based photo gallery might have very different criteria. Also, someone shooting to win a contest might have very different standards.
Regards,
Tom