I'll spell out the point I was trying to make:
People no longer perceive photographs to have any value.
...
I am not to blame for that. Other people can use whatever excuses they want but the victim is not to blame, the person who takes another's work is.
It read to me like the complaint was that you were no longer overpaid for work because images are easier to come by. I don't see how that's related to intellectual property theft nor do I see it has my "fault" in any way. In fact, I see nothing wrong with it. Maybe if no one created competition then your earning power would be preserved, right?
I'll mention that web pages are designed to crosslink and linking to another person's image is not automatically wrong. Presenting that work as your own is. It is preposterous to suggest that photographers encourage such theft by sharing online.
Well you wouldn't leave a French impressionist painting in the street would you?
That is nothing like what is occurring online.
Yes, I leave my car unattended on the street. Everyone does from time to time. It's called parking. I've had two auto thefts in my life; both were in public garages with full time security. Neither were my fault.