I enjoyed diving in the same ocean as Tim in February, but as the problems are most likely (a) DCS and (b) neuro-developmental, I believe that this advice is falsely reassuring.
Tim's advice does, however parallel that given to doctors in the UK: this is the advice of the United Kingdom Sport Diving Medical Committee:
http://www.uksdmc.co.uk/standards/Standards-%20pregnancy.htm
Recreational diving is a pastime: is a break from diving really such a high price to pay when the risks in pregnancy are unknown: probably not great, but also not known?
Any post on this topic from me assumes that the hyperbaric exposure has already taken place and the poster is seeking advice in this situation as I believe is the case here. I would agree whole heartedly that the only general advice that can be given is, if attempting to concieve or pregnant do not dive.
However given the number of women diving and the tendency to reproduce that our species has I believe that if there were a strong corellation > say1:10 of foetal abnormalities occurring due to recreational diving then the connection would have become clinically apparent. Still this level of risk is not known and even considerably less risk than than this would be very undesirable. My advice in this situation is pragmatic and depends on the views of the couple, the only likely test I can think of that MIGHT detect foetal abnormality is by high res Ultra sound and while I agree completely that it will not detect all neuro developemental abnormalities it is about all we have to offer at present. It is of course pointless if termination is completely out of the question.
It was good diving with you Tim
Tim Digger