This has turned into a saga and is still not resolved.
After my success of the test after replacing the O and X rings on the problem control I did two more dives: 21 June, 12.5m, 34 minutes; 27 June, 13.8m, 38 minutes. Both dives were uneventful and no water got in the housing. I didn't take many photos on either dive as there wasn't much to photograph.
General diving conditions were pretty poor for most of July and I didn't get in for another dive until 25 July. On a dive that weekend (10m, 45 minutes) the housing seemed to perform very well. I took lots of photos, including adjusting the aperture a few times on the dive. At one point I even jiggled the control as I was confident it was fixed. The leak detector did not alert. The housing went into the back of the car as normal after the dive. When I got home, the leak detector was flashing. Water had got in but it mustn't have made it to the detector until the movement in the car. There was much less water than before (although the pad had soaked up a bit) but there was still some there. I'm pretty sure it was the jiggling of the control that did it.
The next weekend I took the camera and housing for another dive (10m, 51 minutes). This time I was very careful when changing apertures not to jiggle the control. No water got into the housing which assured me it wasn't just a general leak and that the problem was still most likely related to the sub-command dial control.
I emailed Ikelite again explaining the problem in detail and asking for assurance they'd be able to test it properly. They said they can do a vacuum test which allows them to simulate the pressure but still being able to manipulate the controls. They said I needed to include an letter explaining the problem.
On Tuesday 4 August I packaged up the housing with a very detailed letter explaining the problem and that it was the sub-command dial control that was letting in water, and shipped it to them. They got the housing on Friday 7 August.
On the morning of 18 August (so COB 17 August in the US), I get an email from Ikelite saying they have done a pressure test (no mention of a vacuum test) and it did not leak and asking if there was anything else I wanted done before they sent it back. To say I was annoyed at this point is an understatement. I wrote back to them explaining yet again the problem (as already detailed in the letter) and that a vacuum test was required with particular attention to that control.
The next morning I get an email from Ikelite saying they'd get the repair tech to go over it with a vacuum test again (even though the previous email suggested that a vacuum test hadn't been done) and that a copy of the letter had been printed for him - um... it was already printed in the box with the housing. This is now the morning of the 19th for me and the afternoon of the 18th for them.
I didn't hear back from them so I assumed they were continuing with the testing. On the evening of Tuesday 25 August, there's a knock at the door and there's a courier with the housing. I check the documentation and it was sent on the 19th but nothing stating what they had done. There was no charge for the investigation or shipping back to me.
I emailed them to find out what was done an was told they vacuum tested it and could not get it to leak. They also said they pulled all the controls apart and claimed they could see evidence of water getting past one of the controls on the back and they replaced that control. Now, if water had indeed got past one of the controls on the back of the housing, the camera would have got wet. There's not much clearance between the back and the camera. At no point has the camera got wet. They did nothing at all about the sub-command dial control (which I know was letting water in and can do it without wetting the camera).
I was pretty disappointed that they had not done any work on the suspect control, despite me telling them a number of times I had seen water get in. They also didn't even bother to email me before they sent the housing back - because if they had I would have told them to replace the control even if I had to pay for it.
I took the housing for another dive on Friday afternoon (28 August) and I couldn't get it to leak. Even though I wasn't confident it was fixed, I was desperate to take photos so I took the camera on a night dive. I had no problems at all for the whole dive. I didn't need to change the aperture and I wasn't going to push my luck - at least on a night dive. Just as I was standing up at the end of the dive to take my fins off, the detector started flashing. I can't be sure if water got in earlier and standing up caused the water to flow over the detector's sensor or if I might have bumped the control as I was standing up (which is entirely possible as the control is next to the handle). Bottom line was I still had a leaky housing.
Another email to Ikelite and they are now suggesting I don't know how to put the main and port O rings in - despite having more than 100 dives with DSLR housings and even more dives with previous housings and cameras.
Now, I can understand that they weren't able to reproduce the problem (I have no idea how much they jiggled the suspect control), but I can't understand why they wouldn't replace the control that has let water in on at least 3 occasions. I also don't understand why they wouldn't email me before shipping the housing back knowing how long it takes and how much it costs to ship a housing halfway around the world.
I'm at a loss with what to do next. If I didn't have so much invested in Ikelite gear (strobes, ports, D70 housing) I'd cut my losses and go with another manufacturer. I'm sick of diving without a camera but I also don't want a risk the camera in a unreliable housing.