Exactly, Jeff! I think it's very naive to think that all the safety protocols in the world will do any good once you're in the water. As it's been said many times, it's not "if" BUT "WHEN" an incident will occur and also a matter of severity. This is regardless of operator.
Markus Groh died of complications from a single bite, which severed his artery. The shark certainly didn't attack in the general usage of that word and it certainly didn't kill him for food. To think otherwise would be, to put it mildly, not the correct way of seeing things and it furthers the demonization of sharks. This runs contrary to message of conservation of sharks.
Jim's press conference tells us what happened. He was laying bait and a reef snapped at the bait but bit his arm instead. It also immediately let go. This is obvious as Jim still has full motion of his arm and according to the report, will be cleared to dive in 10 days or so. The injuries aren't major.
What happens on the operator's boat can vary from trip to trip depending on clientele. Obviously Dolphin Dream has satisfied customers, otherwise they'd be out of business. Same for JASA Still, their actions on the Les Stroud show is on broadcast TV and can't be denied. It includes feeding tigers, enticing sharks to bite "scented" human replicas and also limbs, all at around an area where there are other divers.
Then again, JASA can't deny that shark incidents have happened on their boat, although the actual incidents can hardly be attributed to the operator's safety protocol. The facts are out there. Anyone doing research will need to know about all the operators, not just DD and JASA.
Good to see that you are changing your opinion slightly Drew.
Exactly, Jeff! I think it's very naive to think that all the safety protocols in the world will do any good once you're in the water. As it's been said many times, it's not "if" BUT "WHEN" an incident will occur and also a matter of severity. This is regardless of operator
This is not something that I have heard you say before Drew
Markus Groh died of complications from a single bite, which severed his artery. The shark certainly didn't attack in the general usage of that word and it certainly didn't kill him for food. To think otherwise would be, to put it mildly, not the correct way of seeing things and it furthers the demonization of sharks. This runs contrary to message of conservation of sharks.
Please elaborate on this Drew, what complications do you know about and did you offer your evidence to the coroner, other than that Marcus Groh suffered a major cut from a shark bite to an artery and he was many miles away from medical assistance that he needed immediately. If you know of other complications then please do elaborate so that we all have a perfect understanding of the events that day when Marcus Groh died.
The shark certainly didn't attack in the general usage of that word and it certainly didn't kill him for food
How you can come out with a statement like this Drew is beyond me, How on earth can you use the word " CERTAINLY ". You were not there, or were you?, and you "certainly" are not the shark that done this to Marcus. You might be a man of big words and plenty of wisdom, but please use them both in the correct context otherwise you make yourself look rather silly.
at·tack (-tk)
v. at·tacked, at·tack·ing, at·tacks
v.tr.
1. To set upon with violent force.
2. To criticize strongly or in a hostile manner.
3. To start work on with purpose and vigor: attack a problem.
4. To begin to affect harmfully: a disease that attacks the central nervous system.
I would say that the shark in question was in the number 1 of the above.
It may be did not kill Marcus for food, but I would say that it attacked Marcus with violent force.
Stew
RIP Marcus Groh