Jump to content

Brandon Cole

Members
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Country

    United States
  1. Super report, Dave, and outstanding photographs!
  2. Thank you very much, Dave! I am very interested in the Atom as the smallest "powerful" strobe. Greatly appreciate your time and thoughts.
  3. Hi Zlati, If you decide to break up the package, I am interested in the 28-60 zoom gear. And maybe the lens too. I do not need the WWL1. I live in the USA (Washington state, zip code 99206) , so we'd have to figure out postage Thank you, Brandon
  4. I have a couple
  5. Park started following Brandon Cole
  6. Thank you, JS1221. Will do.
  7. Fabrizio Fehr started following Brandon Cole
  8. FOR SALE: Nauticam MFO-1 (Mid-range Focus Optimizer 1) NEW. Never used. Perfect condition. Read about it here: https://www.nauticam.com/products/mid-range-focus-optimizer-1-mfo-1 Comes with 2 rubber caps, neoprene bags, and spacer ring. Asking $360 via Paypal, shipping included in the USA. Thank you, Brandon
  9. Thanks @d2b ! I appreciate your kind words and am glad the diopter arrived safely and on time. Best to you and your super macro photo journey!
  10. Thanks for the tests, and the interesting conversation and observations. In my experience, having shot WWL, WACPC, FCP, and WACP (I still own the last two) both in pool tests and in the real world, depth of field with the FCP is different: lower/less. I'm not smart enough to understand why, but the FCP disappoints in the depth of field department, at least for me, in the f5.6 to f11 range. f13 satisfactory, usually. f14 better. f16 no longer bothers me, other than for the higher ISO required.... However, the zoom range of the FCP (with the 28-60) is fantastic! At least three lenses in one. I've been mostly pleasantly surprised with Canon 8-15 + Kenko 1.4x with 140, 170, and 230mm ports on Canon 5d4. Acceptably sharp, fast and accurate enough focus, and some appreciated zoom range. But still limited compared to FCP and 28-60 on Sony.
  11. Camera scam/tax still alive at SJD. A couple weeks ago a friend was charged ~$400 USA for a Z8 Nauticam rig. I avoided any fees by using a carnet once again. I paid about $560 upfront to cover ~$20k of mostly older gear, including two housings (Canon 5d4 and Nikon d850), 4 flashes, 4 DLSR bodies, lots of lenses, etc.. The carnet is a bit of a hassle (takes extra time for customs inspections leaving US, entering Mexico, and the same in reverse). And it's obviously a considerable upfront expense, but if done properly it removes the uncertainty and anxiety of potentially being nailed upon arrival. For Mexico, I can use the same carnet multiple times in the same 12 month period (2 trips are included for my $560, a little bit more for 3 trips, etc.) provided you list and travel with exactly the same gear. I used Boomerang carnet, again, and will do so again in the future. So for people traveling with a lot of gear, especially new/newish big DSLR/mirrorless rigs, the carnet process remains an option.
  12. Hi d2b. Thanks. Sure, should be fine. Please email me (brandoncoleATmsnDOTcom) or DM me and we can discuss details. Brandon

Important Information

Terms of Use Privacy Policy Guidelines We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.

Account

Navigation

Search

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.