Everything posted by TimG
-
Zen and the Art of Sulking Equipment
I’m a coffee devotee - some would say a coffee snob. Some years back I bought a pretty expensive espresso maker and grinder which I use several times a day. After lots of practice and tweaks, I can pull a pretty decent espresso 95% of the time. But….. if I am away for a few days, the next time I make coffee, it’s not, well, it’s not the best. I swear the machine sulks. I talk to it, frankly, plead with it - and batch 2 is usually back to full form. What has this to do with underwater photography? Having lost all my camera gear, I’ve been on a rebuild with an OM-based M43 system and, a first for me, a Nauticam housing. I was 26-years a Subal man. I bought a new Nauticam flatport but went for a secondhand Zen 100 domeport, in excellent condition, from a totally-trusted member of Waterpixels. He hadn’t used it for years and was happy to sell it on. When it arrived it was the final piece of what is always a complicated jigsaw of equipment. I was delighted. Put the camera in the housing, a little lube on the port o-ring and pushed it into place. It wouldn’t fit. Odd, I thought. Remove clean, replace, push. I could not get the port with the o-ring far enough into the housing throat so the Nauticam locking mechanism would engage. Let me say at this stage that, over 26 years, I’ve fitted loads of ports: domes, flats, megadomes, Zen, Subal…. my Nauticam flatport. I like to think I know what I’m doing. Remove o-ring, try without o-ring, no problem. Fit o-ring, slight lube again. Nope. Wouldn’t fit. Frantic WhatsApps to the seller. Loads of helpful ideas, photos, images. Nope, It would not fit. Email to Zen. Head scratching all around. Leaving for a dive trip in a few days time, I was facing the possibility of no wide-angle capability. Argh. A call to my nearest Nauticam/Zen dealer - Onderwaterhuis. Bring it in, they offered. 90 km drive. Their Nauticam specialist took one look, removed the o-ring, lube, placed it back - and pushed. Nope. More head scratching. Fitted without the op-ring. Clearly nothing wrong with the port, nothing wrong with the housing, nothing wrong with the o-ring. One more time, talking to the domeport - come on, you can fit - and bingo, in it went. It’s now as easy to fit as it should be. Push and lock. So what happened? The domeport hadn’t been out of a cupboard for some time. Was it sulking? Talk to your gear nicely. Be wary of sulking domeports. They cause panic. Big thanks to Onderwaterhuis.nl! (one of our supporters) Espresso, anyone?
-
Stills from my Little Cayman DSO trip in June
Hi Leslie I've just switched to an OM-1ii with a 60mm Zuiko lens but, like you, have not yet got it in the water. Just in case you've not found this already...... Messing around topside, as you do, I noticed one issue which would be a pain underwater especially shooting in Manual: it seemed to me that the default setting was that the EVF/screen would lighten or darken depending on the ISO/aperture or shutter speed. Set to Manual mode, with a shutter speed of, say, 1/200 and an f stop of, say, f11, the EVF/screen was pitch black and impossible to see the subject. I want into MENU > ⚙ GEAR page 3 > LV Mode and set "S-OVF" ("Simulated Optical ViewFinder"). This avoids the problem.
-
what's your fav Canon zoomie
Totally agree. Horrible topside but underwater, superb! Add a 1.4TC and even more flexibility.
-
Hello, Tiger
-
Knock, knock
-
Home Storage Ideas?
Funny that, my partner keeps talking about bins and my equipment. Perhaps she means for storing it? I'm not sure.
-
Hello from Sydney
PominOz! Love it! What a great User name Welcome. Great to have you with us on Waterpixels. We hope you really enjoy the forum. Best wishes from PominAMS. Tim
-
Emergency with Nauticam Port
Wow, well done, Michael. Scary moment. I hope the rest of the trip goes well!
-
full frame vs APSC
Yeah, I really liked it. It was a pleasure to use and I got some terrific images from it. But..... I did find having to use a large domeport (230mm) for wide-angle images an utter pain for travelling. My partner found it an even bigger pain! I used the D800 for about 4 years but decided the travel issues were getting just too much - and switched to a D500. This got me back to a 100mm dome (just tiny in comparison) and a Tokina 10-17mm lens. This was a brilliant setup and I missed nothing from the D800. As you may have read in other posts I've made, I no longer see the point in having FF unless you have some specific reason for it. Having lost all my D500 gear, I've now gone for M43 in the rebuild.
-
Subal and D500 RIP: Hello new system
Oh, I hear ya!!!! Interesting to read of your Subal experience. They serviced a 45-degree viewfinder for me after I scratched the viewing glass a few months ago. That was quite quick. But, yeah, not sure I'd want to invest in a new system. Such a pity. They have been superb housing. Will post for sure on how it goes. As for the Nauticam, 45-degree viewfinder. Mercy, it is LARGE compared to the very neat Subal one. Easy to install/remove though, has a diopter adjustment which is nice.
-
Retra Snoot Iris
I love the idea and it was something I asked Retra about a few years ago. They thought then that variable apertures tended to jam after a time and the slide masks were simpler and reliable. In practice, like @Dave_Hicks I only use probably 2-3 sizes of openings and have just the two round-shapped Retra slide masks in carabiners in a BCD pouch.
-
Subal and D500 RIP: Hello new system
Hi Reuben Have to say I agonised. The decision to move to OM and Nauticam was for multiple small reasons which seemed to make the case. I usually only traveled with the Subal housing plus a Nikkor 60mm macro and Tokina 10-17 plus the relevant ports (100mm for the Tokina), Retra strobes and LSD. Even then I was finding the weight and bulk a bit of a pain. When I lost all my gear I thought it time for a rethink. Was it wise to buy a second hand D500? I had contacted Subal about a housing and got no reply. And much though I loved the housings, I couldn’t help but feel Subal were fading away. Nauticam is everywhere in terms of product support, quality, second hand desirability etc. Then there didn’t seem to be a D500-like Nikon body available. I didn’t want to go FF for the weight issues. Several members on Waterpixels talked about the merits of M43 and the OM-1. Those factors persuaded me to switch. There were probably more thoughts in the back of my mind. Not yet got the new system in the water. Soon! But first topside impressions are good. Lenses for underwater use are mind-boggling small and light compared to Nikkor. The Nauticam housing feels good, fits together nicely and I really like the integrated vacuum system and USB bulkhead charging/downloading capability. Port mounting is a little easier than Subal. Push and lock rather than push hard, twist and maybe lock. The housing feels good to handle, perhaps not quite as refined as the Subal. I really liked the size, feel and placement of Subal’s shutter and aperture control wheels. The Nauticam’s are a little smaller and, at the moment, my Subal muscle memory doesn’t find them so easily. Practice eh? Over 25 years of Subal practice. The OM-1ii is similar in size to the Z6 series. It seems hugely capable. AF seems excellent topside. Massive learning curve from Nikon. But one step at a time. Image quality? Waterpixelers, whose views I trust, tell me I won’t tell the difference. I bought a topside lens with the aim of slowly switching entirely to OM. Again, steep learning curve. I got the 12-100 which is similar to the Nikkor 24-200 which is/was my go to travel lens. It’s very similar in size. But other long tele/zooms in the OM range are significantly smaller and lighter than Nikkor equivalents. Everything other than strobe arms now fits in a 1510 Pelican case. Yeah, it’s still heavy! So no real weight saving but it is compact and my second cabin bag will be much lighter. Sorry, this is rather a long reply now. I can tell you more when back from my trip. But so far looks good and I thought it might be helpful to explain the context for my decisions.
-
full frame vs APSC
Rembrandt and his underwater painting technique - should he have used 20MP brushes?
-
Anyone tried Marelux TTL flash trigger?
Hey Phil Most all? It works with most or it works with all?
-
full frame vs APSC
Fair point. We're all here to learn, share and have fun with something we love. Enjoy!!!!!
-
New from California
Hey Rijani Always great to have another Wetpixel refugee on board. A warm welcome. Yep, lots of fellow Wetpixelers are here - which is great. We hope you enjoy the forum. Best wishes Tim
-
full frame vs APSC
Very well said
-
Inon gr140zd pro with gopro 12: minimum focus doubt
This thread sponsored by Omino Bianco. “Omino Bianco: Dazzling your Whites”
-
D850 vs Mirrorless for and older shooter with a lot of existing DSLR gear
You can’t go wrong with the Retras. 👍🏼👍🏼
-
Presentation
Hey Fred! Great to have you with us. A warm welcome to Waterpixels. You've come to the right place to look at upgrading. We offer expert advice! And we love to help members empty their bank accounts 😝 Best wishes
-
full frame vs APSC
@ColdDarkDiver Could you perhaps reload those images as .jpgs?
-
New member from Minnesota.
Hi Areintheocean! A warm welcome to Waterpixels. Great to have you with us, Yep, if you lug 50lbs of camera gear around the world, you've come to the right place! We hope you enjoy the forum. Best wishes Tim
-
Nikkor 105mm f2.8 VR AF-S
For Sale €495.00 Amsterdam (can also be shipped in the UK…A brilliant macro lens for both FF and APS-C (effectively 150mm) Nikon D cameras. In excellent condition, complete with lens hood, paperwork and (slig…
-
Hi all, just joined from UK
Hey Tomo Great to have you with us. A warm welcome to Waterpixels. Best wishes Tim
-
Nikon 8-15 AF-S fish eye
Want to Buy
I’ve PMd you, Igor. I’ve got one, great condition, boxed and would consider selling.