looks kind like a cross between a tiger and great white.
From the perspective of users of images, I am not sure they really care. If you look at most TV advertisements for new cars, most if not all are renderings, rather than actual footage. If I were looking for a pic for an ad needing a shark, why not use an AI one if it were significantly cheaper/better. Advertisers don't owe UW photographers anything, they are trying to sell something. Magazines and websites are an entirely different story. We make medical devices and clearly use stock photos of people that we pretend are real patients but never claim that they are.
So a lot depends on the end use.
Bill