Jump to content

Gmsalterego

Members
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Country

    Italy
  1. To whom may be concerned. Further upgrade as "tripod" by flex-arm
  2. I asked to David Newman, gopro labs. He told me: Format the SD card, run a speed test $SPED=1, and if it reads under 400Mb/s, replace the card. I did some speed test under 180 mb/s, then the results always around 600 mb/s.... May be some sectors corrupted, l'll buy another one. Bye
  3. Hello @Nando Diver which is the memory card you use with 190 mb/s? I'm still having video freezing or chopping last days, Thank you
  4. I like the gopro 12 footage, less expensive, excellent result. Bravo
  5. I bought the inon ucl g55 ZD. Next week I'll test such lens, enjoy Giacomo
  6. Lens holder on cross bar
  7. Hello @Elvandar , how is the attachment? The picture doesn't show this issue. Thank you Ciao
  8. Hello, I did my first dIve with Inon UFL-GR140 pro ZD. I took stills and video footage in 8:7 format but while videos are ok the stills show little vignetting at the four borders. What do you think about that? I think vids dont show vignetting due to stabilization.
  9. Thank you @Davide DB Very clear explanation as usual. In any case, I think I understand that a high bitrate like 190 Mbps will allow you to have a slightly higher slice of pizza. Right?
  10. Thank you @Davide DB Very clear explanation as usual.
  11. Thank you @Davide DB I was comparing 8:7 cropped to 16:9 Vs 16:9 native, both at the same 5.3K resolution and bitrate. No quality loss as mathematical issue: however, 8:7 gives more flexibility. I don't understand what you mean with 190 Mbps as ludicrous, I thought higher speed, better results Ciao, Giacomo
  12. I agree with you but sam elliott says the opposte... strange things
  13. Hello, one more question about INON GR140 ZD lens. I read that allows to take footage using the whole sensor in 8x7. Its better a video taken in 8x7 snd then cropped in 16:9 or a native 16:9 video despite the reduced sensor capability? Thank you in advance
  14. Hello, I would your opinion between a wet lens with glass esternal dome versus the related acrylic version - same INON GR140 ZD - where glass is much more expensive. Someone told me that optical glass is (of course) much better, others that acrylic dome is easier to remove small scratches ( a friend of mine told me the opposite)... The truth is in the middle? Ciao

Important Information

Terms of Use Privacy Policy Guidelines We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.

Account

Navigation

Search

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.