3. Is the way the shark is being dragged out of the water maybe a little excessive; I think so, but do I think the wranglers ought to be shot for it? No. Maybe just cool it a little.
The point is precisely that not all wranglers do that and this particular one did. And it was obvious that some of the customers enjoyed it.
The question is are WP readers ok with such interaction? That was my original question before philosophy, diet preferences (and the metaphysical inferences of it too?!?) and child labor got into the act.
Obviously the interaction between humans and shark are there and it is pretty direct. Those who wish to link this to Doubilet's nudibranch repositioning, it is almost a fair statement. Both require human forced actions ( picking up said nudibranchs/wrangling bait and letting a shark bite on for the ride). The ethics of disclosure have been met by both, well the wrangler can't exactly hide the rope and fish head. ![]()
We are obviously going to have the spectrum of opinions on interaction. The anthropomorphic "how would you like to: be picked and shoved on light studio/have someone pull you up via a pulley while you're eating your tofu burger (homegrown ingredients of course!) sounds a bit holier than thou. On the other end, the arguments for such interaction usually assume the subject is robust and seem healthy when they leave. Anyone bring them back for a checkup 1 or 2 weeks after? Did the bruising(if any) from banging the platform or stress from hanging from a rope cause the shark to die prematurely? Then there's always the view of "what's the big deal if one nudibranch/shark dies? I got the shot."
I wanted to see how many uw photographers think on these issues. I guess it was a bit too much to ask for.
And since the kung fu antics still can't be left out of this thread, I'll just say next time go to a very lively reef with lots of biodiversity and watch the interaction with predators and prey and the personal spaces involved. The answer is just there.