Davide DB

Not to discourage your intentions but 60p is more than adequate, and in the long run the slow motion gets pretty boring. At 120 fps a normal reef scene is practically frozen. 120 fps is mainly used for very fast sports shots or to create special effects in very short moments. The smoothest movements are achieved with properly balanced, lightweight kit and the right posture in the water.

Out of curiosity, why do you need 120p?

Hi all, I'm looking for a 3D printind file for a Nauticam N85 port housing cap and a N85 port rear cap. Thank you in advance 😉

Wow sharp as a blade. Bravo

Link added

I'm not sure I understood these two points. Far be it from me to get into an FF/Crop sensor war 😇

Welcome aboard Ken!

Wow terrific idea! Would you share the files and instructions on this thread? I will add it on the opening post.

Less is more 😉

Nice shots indeed!

It's betterto upload photos in jpeg or png so it could be rendered.

Am I mistaken or does the 30 mm have maximum magnification practically on the surface of the port?

Could it depends on the lens and the critters size?

Do you mean you were on the same boat and you discovered it right now? 😄

Yes but sand is a separate issue. I've scratched several polycarbonate domes with neoprene covers too. Sand or salt particles on the cover inner part are polycarbonate worst enemy.

Ciao Pietro, welcome onboard!

Ciao Cris, Welcome onboard!

Yes, I know. I was asking to know if other people had noticed these differences in the water. On land there are not. Hence the explanation I gave myself. Maybe with a prime lens I could even fool the algorithm, but with a zoom there's no way. Thanks

Are you satisfied with the results? 😈

Hello Browni! Welcome aboard!

Yes I was remembering incorrectly: its FOV is 74.8 - 28.6°. The explanation I gave myself is that the 12-35 behind the dome keeps more or less the same FOV while the WWL changes in FOV significantly confusing the algorithm. Zoom or not you have no way to change the data with a native lens. I should check it again but IIRC The settings are disabled.

Really a deal breaker for me. I'm curious if this "gem" is a design failure on the A1 or applies to A7x line and cinema line FX. https://www.sony.com/electronics/support/articles/00120915 Edit: I see that latest FW update for FX3 added the possibility to view LUTs via HDMI with an endless caveat list:

Do you mean you can't set an output LUT on hdmi? Only in photos or also in video? Btw now all monitors have the possibility to load LUTs. If you can't do it via the housing, you have to set it on land. Of course you then work like this for the whole dive. I will change the title at the request of the op if necessary.

Yes, at the same focal length is significantly more stable. Then I made some test on land and there's no noticeable difference between them. My speculation is the focal length it's part of the OIS algorithm. I don't see other reasons because you have to set it manually on manual lenses. The 14-42 mm @14 has a FOV of 94° while behind the WWL become 130° so I am tricking the algorithm somehow.

I have the "MARK FORUM AS READ" button on all forums except the Critters identification one. I think that's because is the only forum with a subforum and for some obscure reason the app doesn't add that option. It's the only difference I see.