Chris Ross

I don't use a monitor in the water, but use one on land and I think it depends on how good your eyesight is. A 45° viewfinder, you can adjust the diopter to suit and see positively if things are in focus, the rear LCD I can't really tell, using a 5"shinobi on land I need 2x to judge sharp focus. The other issue is how the view renders on the monitor and if you can see all you need to see or if the tools get in the way of the viewfinder data like SS/ f-stop, ISO etc., I know on my OM-1 It's not ideal. You could try this out on land to see.

Thanks for the comprehensive reply Phil. Regarding the use of a 2x, I have not used it either but use the equivalent with a Canon 8-15 adapted to m43, which gives the same field of view flexibility without a teleconverter. In terms of FF rectilinear lens field of view and particularly the horizontal field of view which represents what size subject you can fit in your field you get the 180deg diagonal FF fisheye at 8mm and using a 2x you can zoom the equivalent of a 28mm lens on full frame. The WACP/WWL give you a 130° diagonal which has a horizontal field of around that of a 13-14mm lens and if you have the 28-60 behind it it reaches out to cover the field of a 35mm rectilinear. All of course with some mild barrel distortion. I haven't done the measurements for the Marelux lens, but it will be close to the WACP range. So all you lose out on is the 28-35mm equivalent range with this setup. Leaving aside the optical quality which is not an issue on m43 as there is no TC glass involved, this to me is superb flexibility and some people onsite are prepared to make this trade off, but that's a choice anyone considering this option needs to weigh-up for themselves.

Yes the adapter is a pain, the 55mm adapter will work, but it does involve loading the lens from the front and placing the port over it. Actually the easiest way to do it would with Isotta as they use a larger port and only need a standard extension with zoom gear. Doesn't help you with Nauticam of course. The thing to consider is that the N85 Zen100 works with the Olympus and Panasonic fisheyes, but you need to use the N120 version with the Tokina or Canon, which of course requires the adapter, but 34.7mm is too much extension. so there is no way to do both options with the same dome with Nauticam parts. I seem to recall that Wolfgang ( @Architeuthis ) obtained a custom 30mm N85-N120 adapter at some point from a European supplier which might be an option for you?

I used the Zen100 with the Panasonic 8mm fisheye it worked pretty well. This gallery was shot with the 8mm Panasonic and Zen DP100 dome- apart from 3 or 4 images. : https://aus-natural.com/Underwater/Rowley%20Shoals/index.html the 34.7mm has the advantage of working with the zoom knob on the adapter, it works but is a little slower than the housing zoom control when lenses are mated with the speedbooster version. You could also 3D print a gear to use with the housing zoom control. The 34.7 is unfortunately discontinued. If you can't find a second hand one you should be fine using a 55mm N85-N120, but I expect the zoom control won't be positioned properly for the Nauticam zoom gear, so likely will need a 3D printed gear, I use a custom 3D printed gear with my OM-1 and Canon 8-15. It would be a relatively simple matter to convert it to use on the Tokina lens. That system is very flexible, the Canon 8-15 is equivalent to an 8mm fisheye plus a 14-28mm FF equivalent rectilinear at least in terms of reach, very flexible setup that focuses down to the dome glass. I will say the rig gets rather heavy with the adapted Canon 8-15 and 140mm dome which I have. I expect the Tokina/Zen dome would be a bit lighter.

Wondering what you use your masking for? I still use my trusty old copy of Photoshop CS6 and never went to lightroom, To solve raw development I have Capture One which you can still buy outright and just upgrade when I get a new camera. I find the quick selection tool does a reasonable job if there's enough contrast and it doesn't need to be perfect for my purposes as 99% of the time I'm only selecting the subject to sharpen that and not the background. My other use of masking is for individually working on shadows/highlights and midtones and what I do requires so selection tools as I use luminosity masks which use the image itself to mask. The free Tony Kuyper tools do it perfectly, the download link is here: GoodLight.usLuminosity Masks—Get Ready to FlyOnce you start to understand luminosity masks, actions or a plugin can greatly speed the process of creating them making them much easier to use.I just make a darks/highlights or midtones curve layer and use curves to adjust individually, perfect to boost shadows or tame highlights and the midtones mask is perfect to do an S curve to boost contrast, seems like it has more control.

The wired connectors will work as long as you have a matching bulkhead. Not as convenient at optic fibre as they require maintenance of the o-rings and are prone to corrosion if not well cared for. Having said they will certainly work though quite possibly they will be restricted to manual flash only unless the housing comes with the YS converter for your camera, assuming again your strobes are TTL capable. Otherwise you would be looking for a third party TTL converter. There are several types of bulkhead connectors and I believe Canon TTL bulkheads are 6 pin. This won't stop you using the housing - just make sure you get the right hardware to avoid surprises. You will need to talk to a vendor to get the right combination of housing bulkhead, sync cable and if needed a TTL converter. For manual you only need the correct hot shoe cable.

There's no reason for it to be any different, certain lenses might achieve maximum field at something like 13mm and then zoom in a little, but these lenses achieve a 180deg circular image and a 180 deg diagonal field utilising the whole sensor at the other end In between it is vignetted but not a full circle. It's really only a zoom on APS-C between about 10mm and 14mm or so. At the moment if you want to use a TC to get the flexibility of zooming the Canon 8-15 remains the only game in town - it works due to the fact you have the back focus needed to use with a DSLR and you can use the Sony TC with the nose tucked inside the Metabones adapter. It will remain that way till someone releases a TC in Sony mount that doesn't have the nose and which allows you to attach to the lens.

No reason it won't work for you, just check out how you plan to trigger your strobes - can you optically trigger with this housing or is it cables? You mention S&S strobes - just be aware the older S&S strobes are known to be difficult to trigger optically - specifically the YS-D2 model need a good strong trigger.

I'm sure it would work fine, you just need to work out the correct extension.

Drying the lens can prove difficult, depending on your boat. I advocate putting the wet cover back on and leaving it there, covering with towel etc to prevent it drying completely. It stays on till you get back and you can give your housing a soak. Obviously don't leave it on overnight just till you get back to shore or to a rinse tank where you can give it a soak. I take a foldable cooler with me to protect the housing on the boat and at the end of the day it becomes my personal soak tank. The stains are caused by the water droplets evaporating and drying out. My treatment is a soak then use my air duster to blow all the water off the ports and housing.

This is true, though of course MP is not the full story, the sensor can be tuned differently to optimise noise versus dynamic range etc. at different sensor sizes. I'm sure there is some compositional benefit to framing the image when the the part you are cropping out is not visible as happens when you zoom, probably allows you to fine tune your distance from subject as it's too easy not to get close enough with a fisheye and perhaps this would be less apparent if judging the shot from the full frame.

Don't know how long ago it was purchased, but seems like a lemon, I would be putting the hard word on them for a replacement.

I would think no problem to fit into an N100 port, the OD of the Canon 8-15 is listed as 78.5 while the ID of my N85-N120 adapter is 77mm, so It is only just short of fitting through my N85 system. The Canon lens is 225gr more than the Sony, but for situation it's moot as you can't use the 2x TC with the Sony lens. This won't change until/if someone produces a quality 2x TC without a protruding nose. There is probably some weight saving with a pure N100 setup - you could replace the N100-N120 with a 35mm extension but I expect the N100 dome is very similar weight. I'm just playing modifying the zoom gear I had printed to use the main housing zoom control on my OM-1 housing and it occurs to me that an N100 housing for the OM-1 would solve a lot of issues and would also allow Nauticam to streamline their range of ports. The N85 port is just a little too small for many of the interesting m43 lenses.

You can certainly use the MFO-3 it comes with an m67 adapter to allow it to work on any m67 port. The basic option would be screw it on when you need, but I expect you'd be a lot happier with a flip adapter or some sort of bayonet system - I'm not certain but the pics of the flat port look like it should take the Nauticam bayonet adapter but you would need to check the adapter will fit over the lip of the port. If that works, the SMC with a Bayonet ring should also work. Whether it works will depend on how wide the lip is on the end of the port is (where the M67 thread is) as the Nauticam adapter fits over the lip as it screws on.

Just stumbled across a post from Alex Mustard, posting some photos taken with the new Retra pure II strobe. I have the Pure strobes which are 70 Ws rated and use a slightly smaller diameter circular flash tube which gets more of the strobe light entering a snoot. Here's a link to the post on Facebook: Alex Mustard Pure II Apparently shipping Nov 23. said to be their lightest strobe. Here is the info on Retra's website: Retra Pure II