Troporobo

The first minute of this video shows what the dive is like. This is the operator’s official version, there are many more on YT that confirm the scene as recently as last week. I understand why some people would find it exciting. It looks like a circus to me, a risky one at that. To be clear, this is a very good operator that’s done a lot for conservation. I dive with them regularly, just not on the shark experience. Beqa shark dive

This was posted by a local operator from a shark dive last week in Beqa Lagoon, Fiji. The camera rig was not recovered. Yikes! There are a couple of operators in Beqa that run these baited shark dives. I’m really not a fan of behaviour modification for my entertainment - when the sharks are trained that boat + splash = food, I don’t want to be the splash! I did this dive 20 years ago and only nurse sharks turned up. Now they are regularly attracting bulls and tigers. I am always thrilled to see them under natural conditions but will stay away from artificial feeding frenzies.

What a great project! You’re doing important service. Wishing for the best outcome for this protected area.

I’ve belatedly realized that I neglected to provide feedback on my own experience! I had a great time diving in Palau, it is very beautiful above and below the waves. However the conditions on this visit made photography quite challenging. My visit coincided with the tail end of two big storms that passed to the north, resulting in very strong currents and swells even at depth. I spent more time managing my dive than I did taking shots. Nevertheless I did get a few images that I was happy with, mostly on the plateaus. On the walls, the pelagic life was mostly too far away for my fisheye lens. A more flexible rectilinear zoom would have been better - John’s solution above is spot on. When I go back, I’ll take my 12-40 lens on M4/3.

Beautiful - nicely shot and edited. You captured Anilao’s greatest hits. I especially liked the painted frogfish on the run. I miss the diving there a lot so thanks for the chance to revisit virtually.

What a great sequence. Thanks for sharing Ben!

Removing straps and belts won’t save more than 2 cm at most

I think that the Lowepro Pro Trekker BP 450 AW II backpack is fantastic and perfect for my m4/3 system. I switched to the roller version of one of these a year ago and love it. The flexibility and organization options are the best I’ve found. However, the backpack is 2.7 kg empty so that’s a consideration. My roller is nearly 14 kg with everything I carry, so not a good solution for flying on airlines that weigh carryon items. I start every trip on an ATR-42 with a strict 7 kg limit, so have had to get creative.

If I was happy with a compact camera and two wet lenses, I doubt I’d be keen to move to a much larger system with double the parts and consequent packing, setup, and cleaning. But the potential increase in IQ might be the selling point. (Full disclosure- I use m4/3 gear for that reason plus travel-ability) But why go with three lenses with overlapping range? If you’re willing to consider Nauticam instead of AOI, there is a port and gear for the 12-50mm lens that allows all three ranges. Chris is right that it’s not the sharpest especially compared to the 60mm, and the gear is fiddly to set up, but that combo will outshine the TG-5. I was happy with it for several years and produced some nice images. It turns up second hand once in a while too. Two quick examples below, both without wet lenses (these are jpeg so not full resolution)

Wow, what a spectacular moment and a great image to remember it by!

Same here, very smooth and quick (on Mac OS)

That is my typical setup on an Olympus and I prefer it. But BBF should work however the camera is set: press and release for single AF, press and hold for continuous AF, etc

Very nice indeed, especially for a challenging scenario! I love weird and wonderful macro subjects, and the way you captured the head-on shots seeming to look into the camera gave it impact. Well done.

Very cool - congrats!

I’m now confronting the same issues, as my current location means every trip starts with a flight on an ATR-42 with a strict 7 kg limit for the carryon bag. My usual camera backpack (Lowepro RLX 450) weighs 15 kg when loaded. Now I put the camera in the housing, and it goes into a light commuter style backpack along with a port, two strobes, torch, and wrist computer and transmitter. Everything is lightly wrapped but honestly pretty vulnerable if dropped, so it never leaves my sight. Then I have a briefcase style laptop bag into which goes my personal electronics and all the batteries. Everything else goes into a motley collection of smaller padded bags in the checked equipment duffle. The backpack weighs 6.9 kg and the briefcase has never been weighed. It helps very much that I am a m4/3 user!