I'll actually stick up for Light & Motion on the Pal monitor issue a bit. I don't believe in their entire history of building monitors there has been a PAL issue like this before. The same monitor's driver software works fine on the Sony cameras for both NTSC and PAL builds, as do the standard monitors, so this was definitely an unforeseen hiccup.
The manual wheel issue has been fixed already.
Ryan
While I'm sure nobody expected PAL to be PAL++ with the video out from Canon, I do think John has a valid point as a customer. I know that the PAL versions came out a few weeks later than the NTSC one (and yes John, PAL isn't as important as NTSC in the video market
). Still, LMI, like every other manufacturer, has the responsibility to test the housing's basic functionality before delivery to customer. Whether it be at the dealer or factory, it shouldn't be the customer who discovers the PAL incompatibility.
Obviously, issues like durability (eg. that roller wheel) and precision alignment issues are to be expected due to the short model cycle. This forces manufacturers to design quickly and have a product out, within months of the new release, within certain tolerances in design. It's difficult to test for durability, especially with new specifically designed parts. But simple video output is something that can be simply tested. If they make 500 of these housings, then an extra $3 more to the price to buy the camera and test isn't something a customer is going to balk at.
Nice fix on the wheel btw. Rubber/plastic rollers that aren't fixed/sealed properly to the wheels are just a pain. I've seen quite a few in the last 10 years.