In a minor attempt to clarify the issue of recent price hikes, I tabulated the prices of available underwater housings for a few top cameras.
| CAMERA | Nikon | Canon | Sony a1 & | Nikon | ||||
| & HOUSING | D850 | EOS R5 | a7S III | Z7 II | ||||
| . | ||||||||
| Aquatica | $3,199 | $3,199 | $3,099 | $3,199 | ||||
| Ikelite | $1,895 | $1,695 | $1,795 | $1,895 | ||||
| Isotta | $3,050 | $2,930 | $2,830 | |||||
| Nauticam | $5,159 | $5,159 | $4,540 | $5,056 | ||||
| Seacam | $5,100 | $5,199 | $5,100 | $5,100 | ||||
| Sea&Sea | $3,295 | $4,000 | ||||||
| Subal | $5,000 | $6,550 | $4,500 | |||||
The prices are from Backscatter and Bluewater. The goal is to assist us UW photographers when navigating the issue of price and quality, that is, how to buy a good housing for a reasonable price. Older prices are not available for comparison, but my recent memory tells me that prices for some housings, such as Nauticam's, have indeed gone way up.
Current numbers show that Ikelite's plastic housing is the lowest priced, and for metal housings Isotta is the best buy.
And as mentioned here by others, Nauticam's prices have gone up, and are now in the same range as Seacam and Subal. Seacam continues devoid of fiberoptic bulkheads, a real drawback. Subal, in my biased opinion, is still a top choice with its overall excellent design and quality.
(Aquatica's prices as posted in Backscatter and Bluewater are all about the same, I do not know if this might be an error. My sample admittedly is very small and biased in the choice of cameras, and I hope somebody will gather representative data for a comprehensive comparison.)
References:
https://wetpixel.com/forums/index.php?/topic/69175-nauticams-recent-price-hikes/
https://wetpixel.com/forums/index.php?/topic/60308-d500-housing-choices/