All Activity

I've tried Firefox too - same result! I just tried what you suggested with the page zoom level - still no joy! If someone could please use the Snipping Tool or something similar and send them to me I would be grateful, the graphs that I am missing are - - Guide Numbers - Weights - Power Levels - Flash Duration Edit - I have now been able to get the full screen version of the Guide Numbers to display by reducing Page Zoom to 80%, but the others won't display even with Page Zoom set to 50%... The others all appear as expected with Page Zoom at 100%

To my mind this would be ideal for Giant Pacific Octopus, letting me get a wide perspective inside the den while also being a decent FL for filming if I happen on one out for a stroll. I'd prefer to have it on a flip holder. If it folded over the port I could see 3D printing some sort of cradle to support it when folded and possible add flotation. I'm not a huge fan of the stix since they lose flotation past 30m but I rarely do macro that deep anyway.

Down for me, too. I hope someone has saved the site data or that it has been properly archived somehow.

Nice. Looks like you had better viz than I did.

I didn't have any issue with any of my Windows systems. Edge and Brave (both Chromium based) However, I had an idea I think I figured it out. If I monkey around with the >Page Zoom< level I was able to get the graph to vanish. Then I had to restore to 100% and refresh or close/open the page before the graph would render correctly again. Play around with your Page Zoom settings and see if you can't get it to work. It is also possible a non-Chromium browser like FireFox might work differently and give a different result, but I didn't try that.

Aloha and welcome @kenjiang

So probably not just a Windows problem then. I'm going to email Backscatter and see if they can send me a pdf - if so I will send a copy to you.

Just tried an Incognito browser tab - same problem unfortunately Just tried the same combination - still no joy! I might contact Backscatter.

Estimated U/W weight is 160g or under 6oz so 40g or 1.41oz heaver than the in water weight for Nauticam MFO-3/3II. I suspect a beer cozy would more than offset the buoyancy. On another issue I understand the excitement of wanting a very close focusing 24mm but I am just as excited to use it as a portrait lens for larger subject like the two attached photos both taken at 24mm.

Site is down for me, also checked downforeveryone and it reports it down.

working for me currently - using Windows/Firefox

StiX already has an adjustable float collar for macro ports $65 USD

I was thinking the same, but given the weight of the MV24, I think they are recommending putting it on the rig after getting into the water - which might even be a better idea if combining with a MV60 on a triple flip - One lens you forgot in your list is the MFO-1 I would think a double flip with a MFO-1 & either a SMC-3/MFO-3 depending on the site & then put the MV24 & other in a pocket

I just returned from a Komodo - Alor trip & dove with the Manta's on Sept 4th

Hi JMC22 A warm welcome to Waterpixels. Good to have you with us. We hope you really enjoy the forum. Best wishes.

hopefully they offer a float collar as well.

Pagosa Springs, Colorado - living in the mnts @ 7800 ft but loving blowing bubbles especially in Indonisa

Sorry about the mistake regarding the Nauticam lens. I do get confused about the letters and numbers for some products. This is not a lens ment to be used with zoom lenses and it remains to be seen exactly how close it will be able to focus. Marelux staff has not been advised on the retail cost so you seem to be ahead of the curve on that issue. What I can say is that we are hoping to get a prototype for DEMA on 2 November. I intend to update as soon as I get the final specs. It is clear that water contact wet lenses are a valuable asset to underwater photographers and that new designs have been embraced by the community. Stay tuned for more.

Sad that. And a very strange story all in all.

Same problem here (Macbook Pro M1)...

Inevitable, but still sad

I tried a simple print to pdf and it looked probably much worse than what you have now. I suggest turning off all ad-blockers, etc. Trying viewing it in an Incognito browser tab which usually disables most extensions and filters.