RomiK

WOW! I can finally process so many images otherwise left for 'some day' 😍null

28-60 max length 75.3 (at wide) min focus distance 300mm => focus from front element 225mm 28-70F2 max length 155mmm (140+15?) min focus 380mm => focus from front element 225mm so it might do? Perhaps with WACP-C even more travel friendly for just a slight loss in perceived quality?

Update - and not a good one. Most of the Sea of Cortez group had to pay. Meanwhile another friend of mine from Chile living in Mexico arrived (from our recent Galapagos trip) through Cancun and wrote me: Before going through the x ray machine, I went to the bathroom and took the camera outside the housing and split it between my 3 bags. I didn't have any issues So it seems it’s safe to say one must consider the possibility to pay ransom when traveling to Mexico with underwater imaging equipment.

Sadly I must confirm this problem is ongoing and systematic. A friend of mine currently in Magdalena Bay in Sea of Cortez had to pay $400 on his A7S3 in Nauticam housing... ☹️

I have had WED7 2 years ago and used it on 40 dives. It was probably early unit and it was piece of junk. Yes once the HDMI cable was replaced with newer version I could finally see the image. But then the unit started to act erratically, the buttons were responding like on random basis. There was no way to update the firmware so I returned the unit. The screen wasn't really usable in shallower depths. Also buoyancy is less then optimal - it is a brick and need a lot to compensate. @DiversLens since you mentioned FX3 I am guessing you are serious about video work and will want to shoot Slog3 and perhaps deliver in HDR. I am shooting A1 - different sensor, perhaps similar philosophy but IDK. With A1 I am shooting based on waveform on my Shinobi monitor interpreting clean HDMI log signal into HDR HLG. This gives me maximum brightness keeping the waveform just at the top. At bright scenes my A1 monitor is unreadable while Shinobi shows beautiful scene. So to sum this up if your intentions are similar to mine then you have currently only two options for UW monitors - Shinobi/Ninja and SmallHD Ultra5. These Weefines and Supes won't work as they do not have HDR Log interpreting - but I would be happy if owners of recent versions would prove me wrong. Either way good luck, I am in awe what A1 sensor can produce. P.S. since I am also shooting stills I am contemplating to sell my Shinobi setup and splash for SmallHD - just because their PageOS and Nauticam interface might allow me access settings underwater or even create dedicated presets for stills and video. I can't see Shinobi on Nauticam website anymore. only Ninja. So my Shinobi setup might be for sale. But need to put my hands on SmallHD first.

@Oskar - Retra UWT - the idea was a bold move anyway given the size of the market and these retrofits rarely work for all to be a must have. If I could suggest I'd like the next gen retra to be in a form of neutrally buoyant can with glove friendly controls and battery pack supporting 3-4 amps fast charge over usb-C. With the life expectancy of strobes I am sure by the time you go to market there will be enough demand for upgrade and new acquisitions. Cheers.

I travel with 26 batteries (2 spares) and 2x 4bay USB-C chargers and have 8 batteries charging at any given time. If one of the strobes drops below 50% I quickly change the 8 pack or I do it every 2nd dive no matter what. no issue on a 4 dives per day chasing the big guys on full power like last week in Galapagos. 50-80 full strobe power shots per dive. P.S. I am using 2450mA IKEA NiMH (made in Japan variety)

I wouldn't have it on these (semi)snorkel trips any other way. One thing are optical parameters and what not and another handling the dry weight and underwater mass... I think the old say 'it's not the camera it's the shot stupid' applies triple on these encounters.

urrgghh ... I don't like the movie/photo switch and don't like this part from Nauticam A9III manual : * lift up the Still/Movie/S&Q lever as well as the Focus lever and make sure both lever control on housing are aligned with camera controls before installing the camera into housing slide the camera tray back into the housing along the tray rail with focus switch you at least see visually where the control bracket drop but the movie switch is on the other side and so it's not visible...

This example shows scenario where camera focuses on the bubbles hence they are sharp and also exposure reflects that. In the other examples camera was focusing on subjects in the water hence the bubbles were unfocused if this explanation makes sense

@Floris Bennema - and here is a good example of what @ChipBPhoto mentioned. This happens in my experience with WWL1 rarely so far but it could and does happen.

that's like impossible... for bubbles not to form no matter bayonet or not (I do have bayonet)... the bubbles will show as round spots under certain light conditions - lighter background. Attached pictures are from that one dive I didn't do it (file names show date and time of exposure). The next dive they were gone. And no it's not a dirty sensor 🙂 Now I do believe that since the bubbles need some affinity to stick that by using some kind of nano coating or shampoo treatment the bubbles sticking could be minimized but I did not do any tests for that. But unless one enters the water really slow the bubbles will form, that's like given. Also in a spray bubbles from divers below... not often but it could

This should be framed and put on the wall of every hybrid shooter. Myself I try to do both photo and video on a single dive and more and more I am finding myself with the idea of dedicated photo and video dives as my hybrid dives produce great pictures, great videos but rarely both... lighting, workflow, mindset, lens choice... all in play

Stick to the dome stick to the dome stick to the dome... corners are unimportant - bubbles are... Just came back from Galapagos banging my head for bringing WWL and not the dome... so much action happening during first seconds of the drop and I can imagine a lot of Orca and whales actions are going to happen from zodiac at snorkel... I found WWL-1 to be important for captures such as fish bowl, wrecks, corrals perhaps but for anything frame centric - not really. Having said that this whale shark photo is at 28mm - widest - WWL view - and its eyes are - ehm - less sharp than I`d wish but it was cloudy at Darwin combined with 20m depth - not much room for better than F5.6... but I still have had more or less controlled condition if you could call paddling with your foot like mad fearing for life to keep up with the shark 🙈 and I am sensing the Orcas and whales encounters will be more dynamic. So I'd bring the dome and also 20-70 F4 for days you want to do close ups.

IF they could squeeze in a realtime AF tracking in video WITH visible tracking point now THAT would be a game changer... other than that we can only ask Santa to bring additional fish animal AF 😂... For photo they COULD bring AF bracketing (for macrophotography). Other than that I am happy with what it has. The HDR video I am able to get out of this gen through custom WB - SLog3 - HLG interpretation on Shinobi with waveform controlled overexposure - PQ no LUT conversion and HLG export in FCPX ... it's pretty awesome.

What do you do when after 6 months your dentist clears you for diving? Book a Galapagos trip with 2 weeks departure time 🤣. But OK 🙂 - for fast and flexible (or furious 🙂 there is great saving on Galapagos live aboard Oct 17-24 https://www.zubludiving.com/liveaboard/ecuador/calipso?from=2024-10-01 And so my wife and I are going. While my better half will have iPhone16Pro in Divevolk housing and one weefine smart 10k video light I am scratching my head what to bring and still travel light. For sure I am bringing Sony A1 body, Shinobi monitor and Retra strobes. But then - video lights? I am thinking useless for big stuff and sharks don't like them anyway - 16-35 and/or 20-70 in 180mm glass dome? Are splits really important and nice over there? - or 28-60 and WWL1-B and then kick my head when I start shooting after drop forgetting to clear bubbles? 😂 - is macro really an afterthought in there or are some dives macro friendly? - if macro is yes what about EMWL130 in that environment? I remember Socorro and Cocos were all about the big stuff. Macro and video lights were utterly useless. Is Galapagos itinerary the same? Thanks anyone for chiming in!

Great idea. I will entertain embassy in Prague with the help of my friend who runs larger diving travel Operations (he also owns safari boat in Egypt 🙈). Let’s put some pressure on 🤟

I have created a petition for this. Please join if you support this: https://chng.it/kkpq5MnYSX

What I meant was that you could use it for a year on a worldwide travel should you choose to travel to other questionable exotic destinations (e.g. recent development in Indonesia - which I think was relaxed a bit) https://www.londonchamber.co.uk/international-trade/trade-documentation/ata-carnet/ata-carnet-faqs/#:~:text=An ATA Carnet can be,the validity of the document. For sure. The ball is at tour operators hand now as only they could put pressure on somebody inside mexgov to issue clarification on camera accessories. That would put this issue to bed.

Wow, things move fast in the internet age... this is disgusting development and certainly is putting Mexico cenotes and Socorro off my list until I am ready to add $400 and a hassle and time to my trip... I went quickly through ATA Carnet options and although possible it simply puts fun out of a trip. Mexico says: https://anam.gob.mx/exportacion-e-importacion-temporal-de-mercancias-mediante-cuadernos-ata-ing/ basic fees: https://www.atacarnet.com/processing-fees ... and something special for Mexico as always: https://www.atacarnet.com/advisory/Mexico-Special-Considerations In theory ATA Carnet would solve out world travel for a year for one fee but in practice dealing with customs on arrival AND departure and various special considerations ... 🤮

It depends what would you want to calibrate it for. On my MBP M2 (same screen) without any calibration I am getting WYSIWYG on my Canon Pro1000 printer. However - on different LCD screens I see different pictures. And it happened when I was in Canon's showroom to test their ProGraph4200 printer their calibrated monitor attached to it showed horrible picture that I brought only for that printer to print it out exactly as it looked on my MBP... So I would approach the issue of the calibration in relation to the output device you would like to see your MBP processed images on... 🤷‍♂️ It's excellent.

I guess it is all about priorities and why would you want to use scooter with camera mounted for video at all. When I tried it my vision was a moving shot, a bypass shot at various angles up to perpendicularly. For these should they last for more than a split second and if you want to have control over framing you really need to control the camera by hand. Otherwise it's a random success nailing the frame and be stable or you just take what you get. Savalia video - talking about shot technique and result - right around 2:20 mark (for example) shows visible wobble caused by the camera placement and the way it was operated. Ok ish for documentary but not a beauty shot. And it's not the only occasion. So for the documentary anything will go. But for good and beauty shots - not really. Having the camera far away on the tip of the scoot only exacerbates the issue.

I've tried the (mini)scooter/SonyA1/Retraflashes once and my take from it was: - need to go really slow otherwise things shake up. UW rig Hydrodynamics not friendly to speed 🙂 - need to operate scooter by left hand and hold the rig using right hand to stabilize the buoyancy issues and control the shot. - I used 360deg rotating tripod bases I could do variable angle shots I'd say the camera placement on the picture above is good for GoPro and small lights for documentary (such as my friends working on 80m U72 submarine wreck down in Croatia last month) and is not good for any creative work Since I fly to dive I abandoned the idea of taking DPV with me as I have too many things to transport already 🤷‍♂️

I don't quite understand what's the fuzz about this. Granted we arrived to Mexico through Cancun in December 2022 but still the rules haven't change did they? As per regs you can bring 2 cameras, three cellphones, laptop and accessories... • Two photographic or video recording cameras; photographic material; three portable cell phone or other wireless networks equipment; a global positioning equipment (gps); an electronic agenda; a portable computer equipment of the so-called laptop, notebook, omnibook or similar; a portable copier or printer; a burner and a portable projector, with its accessories. https://www.gob.mx/shcp/articulos/lo-que-debes-saber-al-pasar-por-una-aduana-mexicana?idiom=es or https://www.gob.mx/epn/es/articulos/que-mercancia-puedes-ingresar-a-mexico That customs want to impose their own rules... well that's a play of habit of southernly mentality but as long as one know it's rights and rules one has ammunition towards such creative individuals... Perhaps print the regs in Spanish and have it ready to smack these on their head?

I meant this (picture)... -100g total is good but the distribution is of an essence too. The picture have strobe with empty main body compartment and full booster to mimic Powervault weight distribution. The powervault sticks out even more and physics arm power law applies correspondingly. Not a big deal and definitely not as big as some video lights but still something to keep in mind when arms fully stretched out. For my gen of strobes (depending on cells dimensions flexibility which you might not have) I would be happy to have slightly less capacity in exchange for compact dimensions. But maybe there is no flexibility on lion cells size so that might not be possible IDK 🤷‍♂️... it's always like what we want vs. what we can get 😑 I am certain retra gen5 will have this inside 🤙