Nauticam has a 4" curved port for the Olympus 9-18 mm lens, but Aquatica just announced their port for this lens, which is a much larger 8" dome port.
What matters is the optical radius of the port, the 4" Nauticam semi-dome has the same optical radius as the 6" port for the 7-14mm. The Aquatica may have a larger optical radius being that the dome is 8" (but maybe not because it appears to be a portion of an 8" dome, and the 6" nauticam port, which the 4" dome is a part of is also a part of a larger than 6" dome). It's difficult to tell from the size of the dome itself. But there are other factors that affect image quality, like where the lens sits in relation to the dome.
When you put a dome underwater, it actually creates a virtual image that is very close to the camera (very roughly 4 times the optical radius of the dome, for objects that are at infinity underwater). But the virtual image is strongly curved (like the dome) and so the corners of this virtual image are much closer to the camera than the centre. You need the depth of field just to get the corners sharp even for objects that are all far away underwater. However, larger domes and stopping down are not the only way to improve corner sharpness underwater. A simple +2 diopter can provide nice corner sharpness with the 9-18mm lens even with a small 4" dome (see Storker's post here):
http://wetpixel.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=51969&p=343523
That Aquatica housing does look beautiful though...