Mark H Posted 17 hours ago Posted 17 hours ago Hi All As some will have read, I had a housing failure that killed my beloved D500 set up. As a result of good insurance I had money to burn and bought myself a Z8. I'm choosing to go with Nauticam this time as Sea&Sea don't have a housing at the moment (and the housing that failed on me was Sea&Sea). I've used Sea&Sea since 2007 but I know nothing of Nauticam and almost as little about Nikon Z full frame cameras. I'm sorted on macro (that is easy - f mount 60mm and z mount 105mm). What I can't work out is wide angle. There isn't anything that replaces my favorite Tokina fisheye and that won't auto focus on the Z8 (nor is it FF). I have a F mount 14-24 f2.8 that I use above water, and a Nikon 8-15mm which is also f mount. Both are very heavy lenses. I'm guessing that these would give me close to what I had and would need the 230mm glass dome (though there are lots and lots of dome options and I'm hedging at glass but as to size 180mm, 230mm and 250mm, I'm thinking the 180mm is too small and the 250mm is too heavy!)? I could buy the Z mount 24-50mm and put it behind a WWL-1B, WWL-C, WACP-1, WACP-1B, WACP-C but not the FCP-1 as I don't have the money nor want the weight of that. On cost the WACP-2 is also way too expensive and heavy. I will be taking this diving all around the world as well as the UK and weight is a major problem, isn't it? Hoping for some advice before contacting vendors as I prefer to vaguely have an idea before being guided down an expensive route. I know good shops don't really do that but it makes me feel a bit better 😆. I hope someone has already trod this path and can shed some light on the optimum route. Cheers Mark 2
Dave_Hicks Posted 16 hours ago Posted 16 hours ago Get the WWL-C and 24-50z setup. Excellent and very versatile. You may also want the 8-15mm behind a dome. I use it with the Zen 180mm with a 20mm extension. Not sure what else you could need beyond that. I also have a Kraken krl09 wet-wide lens for the 60mm on a flip, nice for some situations where you want true macro with a wide option. I designed a 3d printed zoom gear for the 24-50z. I am happy to send you one for shipping cost, and save you a couple hundred. DM me if interested. 1
TimG Posted 11 hours ago Posted 11 hours ago Nauticam recommended the WWL-C and 24-50 kit lens for me to use with a Z6iii. I have no experience of the combination and my natural inclination was to go with the Nikkor 8-15. 1
Dave_Hicks Posted 11 hours ago Posted 11 hours ago (edited) 29 minutes ago, TimG said: Nauticam recommended the WWL-C and 24-50 kit lens for me to use with a Z6iii. I have no experience of the combination and my natural inclination was to go with the Nikkor 8-15. The WWL-C is far more versatile providing 130deg wide angle and near macro zoomed to 50mm. The quality is excellent and no different from the WACP. It is a wet lens, but I've not found bubbles to be an issue. It's easy to clear it if that is a concern. This is my go-to setup most of the time. I don't think it replaces a Fisheye, and I still have the 8-15mm. However, I only use that in very specific scenarios where an ultra-wide fields of view is beneficial. Here are two shots from the same dive with the 24-50 & WWL-C at 24mm & 50mm. Edited 11 hours ago by Dave_Hicks 1
Chris Ross Posted 8 hours ago Posted 8 hours ago Your wide angle choice depends on how wide you want to go and how much reach you need. Here's fields of view of a few options compared to what you get from a Tokina 10-17. I am comparing by horizontal field of view rather than diagonal as this generally sets what you can fit within a frame. Fisheye corners stretch a lot more so than rectilinear of the WWL, but usually you don't have important subject matter there. Tokina 10-17 DX: Fisheye - 22.5mm rectilinear 144- 81° horizontal field Full frame: FCP with 24-50: Fisheye - 23mm rectilinear 140-97° WWL-C with 24-50: 14-43mm rectilinear 106 - 42° 8-15 plus 1.4x: Fisheye- 16mm rectilinear 144-97° The closet match to a Tokina 10-17 is the very pricey FCP. You already have the 8-15 so adding a 1.4x to that with a Nauticam 140mm dome would be a good solution if you don't need the full reach of the 10-17. I wouldn't consider the 14-28 for use in a dome, you need at least a 230mm and I recall seeing reports the 14-28 is not that great UW behind a dome.
Dave_Hicks Posted 8 hours ago Posted 8 hours ago (edited) 25 minutes ago, Chris Ross said: Tokina 10-17 DX: Fisheye - 22.5mm rectilinear 144- 81° horizontal field Full frame: FCP with 24-50: Fisheye - 23mm rectilinear 140-97° WWL-C with 24-50: 14-43mm rectilinear 106 - 42° 130-72º 8-15 plus 1.4x: Fisheye- 16mm rectilinear 144-97° You have the wrong data for the WWL-C FOV. It's 130-72º per the port chart. Edited 8 hours ago by Dave_Hicks
ChipBPhoto Posted 6 hours ago Posted 6 hours ago (edited) Hi @Mark H - congrats on your new rig! I agree with the comments listed above. The WWL is a terrific option for a blend of travel size and image quality. It is on my rig about 90+% of the time. One of the best features is it can focus at almost macro level of closeness to your subject. (See Dave Hicks amazing nudibranch). I have basically gently placed the dome on a starfish leg and it nailed the focus! As far as Nauticam in general, you will love it! I’m on my 3rd Nauticam housing and have found them all to be extremely well made and quite durable. Just remember to articulate the buttons/levers in fresh water after the dive to keep them working well. Blow out the excess water after to keep them clean underneath. Also, be sure to dry off the housing with a soft cloth to keep it from showing hazy water spots on the black body finish. And of course use their grease for their gray o-rings. The main body o-ring needs basically no grease as it doesn’t move. I run it through my fingers after I’m done prepping the others to pick up just a hint of the residue. Enjoy! Edited 6 hours ago by ChipBPhoto
Recommended Posts