Everything posted by RichN
-
Cozumel Officials Clarify Customs Treatment of Dive Computers and Underwater Camera Housings
Underwater camera housings traveling with their corresponding cameras are to be treated as photographic accessories, while dive computers are to be classified as sporting equipment, according to Cozumel tourism officials following meetings with Mexican Customs. Broader questions about strobes, ports, wet lenses and whether the interpretation applies throughout Mexico remain unresolved. September 21, 2026 — WaterPixels There may finally be some movement in the long-running dispute over how Mexican Customs treats the specialized equipment carried by visiting divers and underwater photographers. Following meetings between Mexican Customs officials, the Quintana Roo Tourism Secretariat (SEDETUR) and representatives of the diving industry, Cozumel tourism officials say two particularly important pieces of equipment now have clearer treatment when visitors enter the destination: dive computers and underwater camera housings. According to Elías Farah Ceh, Cozumel's Director of Tourism and Economic Development, dive computers brought by tourists are to be classified as sporting equipment rather than laptops or tablets during Customs inspections. For underwater photographers, an even more significant clarification concerns camera housings. Farah Ceh said that underwater camera housings will be considered camera accessories when they travel with the corresponding camera. If a housing is transported separately from its camera, however, it may instead be counted against the passenger's duty-free merchandise allowance and could become subject to tax if the applicable allowance is exceeded. The clarification was reported September 19 by Mexican news outlet Ruptura 360, following a meeting in Cancún involving Customs personnel, SEDETUR and representatives of Cozumel's diving community. Customs shown how modern dive equipment is actually usedThe issue appears to have gone beyond a conventional meeting between government and tourism officials. During the discussions, experienced diver Alberto Friscione reportedly demonstrated equipment used for both ocean and cave diving, helping Customs personnel distinguish specialized dive equipment from ordinary consumer electronics. That distinction is particularly relevant to dive computers. Although today's units may resemble sophisticated smartwatches or electronic devices, their primary function is as life-support-related diving instrumentation, tracking information such as depth, dive time, decompression status and other parameters needed during a dive. Treating such a device as a laptop or tablet can therefore create problems when Customs officers apply passenger allowances intended for conventional electronics. The same problem has affected underwater photography equipment. To someone familiar with underwater imaging, a camera housing is clearly part of the system required to operate a camera underwater. But Mexico's published passenger-baggage rules refer more generally to cameras and “photographic material,” leaving considerable room for interpretation when Customs encounters housings, ports, strobes and other specialized components. The latest Cozumel clarification appears to address at least the housing portion of that problem. Quintana Roo confirms underwater photography equipment is being discussedThe Government of Quintana Roo has separately confirmed that underwater imaging equipment is part of the current discussions with Customs. In a September 18 statement, SEDETUR said representatives met with Cancún Customs officials and members of the nautical and diving sectors specifically to review the equipment now being brought into the Mexican Caribbean by visiting divers. That review included equipment used for cave and cavern exploration as well as specialized underwater photography and video equipment. Cancún Customs chief General Luis Antonio Balcázar Bustos participated in the meeting along with senior officials responsible for legal affairs, passenger services and Customs operations. According to SEDETUR, the meetings are intended to produce several improvements: better training for Customs personnel; direct communication between Customs authorities and representatives of the diving sector; and clearer information for tourists arriving with specialized equipment. Additional Mexican reporting published September 21 says those efforts are continuing as officials work to establish procedures that make entry into the Mexican Caribbean with personal and specialized diving equipment more predictable. SEDETUR Secretary Bernardo Cueto Riestra said more than half a million tourists visit the Mexican Caribbean annually to dive, making resolution of these issues particularly important to the region's tourism industry. Complaints and cancellations put pressure on officialsThe discussions follow a period of increasing frustration among international divers and underwater photographers. WaterPixels has followed reports involving Customs treatment of underwater imaging equipment in Mexico since 2024, including complaints associated with Cancún, Cozumel and Los Cabos. More recently, local Cozumel business representatives have said uncertainty and disputed Customs charges have contributed to cancellations by visiting dive groups. The issue gained additional attention this summer as individual divers and underwater photographers began publicly calling for travelers to avoid Mexican dive destinations until the Customs situation was clarified. The current discussions between Customs, tourism officials and the dive industry appear to be a direct attempt to reduce that uncertainty. Important questions remainThe latest development is encouraging, but underwater photographers should be careful not to interpret it as a complete resolution of the Mexican Customs issue. WaterPixels has not yet located a published national directive from Mexico's National Customs Agency (ANAM) formally stating that the camera-housing interpretation applies at every Mexican port of entry. The current information comes from Cozumel tourism officials describing agreements reached during discussions with Customs. It also addresses only part of a typical underwater imaging system. Questions remain concerning equipment including: dome and flat ports; interchangeable lenses; underwater strobes; video and focus lights; wet wide-angle and macro lenses; external viewfinders; extension rings and gears; strobe arms and related accessories. A serious underwater photography system can contain all of these components while still involving only one personal camera. How Mexican Customs classifies that complete system remains the key question for traveling photographers. There is also an important geographic question. Are these interpretations being used only in Cozumel and Cancún, or will Customs officers apply the same criteria in other Mexican entry points, including Los Cabos? Until that question is answered by ANAM or another federal authority, travelers should not assume that procedures will necessarily be identical throughout Mexico. WaterPixels has requested official clarificationWaterPixels has sent a detailed bilingual media inquiry to Quintana Roo Tourism Secretary Bernardo Cueto Riestra and Cancún Customs, asking for clarification directly from the authorities involved. Among the questions we have asked: whether a camera housing traveling with its camera is officially considered part of the personal photographic system; how ports, strobes, lenses, wet optics, lights and other underwater imaging accessories should be classified; whether limits exist on the number or value of those accessories; whether these interpretations apply nationally; what procedure travelers can use to challenge an assessment they believe was made incorrectly; whether an ATA Carnet is expected for recreational photographers; and when the proposed clearer equipment guidance will be published. We have also asked officials to clarify the status of the temporary Customs arrangements reported earlier this summer and reports of new complaints after September 1. At the time of publication, WaterPixels had not yet received a response. For now, the recognition that an underwater housing accompanying its camera should be treated as a camera accessory, and that a dive computer should be treated as sporting equipment, represents a potentially meaningful step toward resolving the problem. The larger question is whether those interpretations will now become clear, written and consistently applied Customs policy across Mexico. This report is based on official statements from the Government of Quintana Roo and SEDETUR, recent Mexican news coverage, and documented reports from the WaterPixels community. WaterPixels has requested additional clarification from SEDETUR and Cancún Customs and will update this story as new official information becomes available.
-
INON Releases ZD Front Mask for GoPro MISSION 1
INON has released the new ZD Front Mask for MISSION 1, providing support for a range of INON ZD-mount wide-angle and close-up lenses when using the GoPro MISSION 1 with its official Protective Housing. INON Inc. has announced the release of the ZD Front Mask for MISSION 1 on September 18, 2026. The new front mask is designed specifically for the GoPro Protective Housing (MISSION 1 series) AGDIV-001. INON has also released the ZD Front Mask for MISSION 1 Grip Set, which combines the new front mask with the company's 4D Light Grip for use with an optional underwater light. ZD Front Mask for MISSION 1 ZD Front Mask for MISSION 1. Image: INON Inc. Attaching the ZD Front Mask provides an INON ZD Mount for compatible attachment lenses. The supported wide-angle lenses include the UFL-GR140 ZD, UFL-GR140 Pro ZD and compact UFL-G140 ZDunderwater semi-fisheye conversion lenses. INON states that the large-aperture optics of the UFL-GR140 ZD provide a wide, high-quality view across all wide-angle FOV settings of the GoPro MISSION 1. The Front Mask also supports three INON close-up lenses: the UCL-G165 II ZD, UCL-G100 ZD and UCL-G55 ZD. For the MISSION 1 and MISSION 1 PRO, INON specifies the following depth-of-field ranges: Lens Depth of Field UFL-GR140 ZD / UFL-GR140 Pro ZD 9 cm / 3.5 in to infinity UFL-G140 ZD 9 cm / 3.5 in to infinity UCL-G165 II ZD 10 cm / 3.9 in to 25 cm / 9.8 in UCL-G100 ZD 7 cm / 2.8 in to 12 cm / 4.7 in SpecificationsCompatible housing: GoPro Protective Housing (MISSION 1 series) AGDIV-001 Mount: INON ZD Mount Compatible lenses: UFL-GR140 ZD, UFL-GR140 Pro ZD, UFL-G140 ZD, UCL-G165 II ZD, UCL-G100 ZD and UCL-G55 ZD Dimensions: 82.0 × 98.0 × 52.5 mm (3.2 × 3.9 × 2.1 in), excluding handle Weight: Approx. 65 g (2.3 oz) in air / 26 g (0.9 oz) underwater Materials: PC, POM and other materials ZD Front Mask for MISSION 1 Release date: September 18, 2026 JAN/EAN: 4570018121418 ZD Front Mask for MISSION 1 Grip Set Release date: September 18, 2026 JAN/EAN: 4570018121425 INON notes that third-party housings are not supported. The company also advises users to consult its compatibility information regarding Front Mask and lens vignetting. INON notes that vigorous camera movement may cause the lens hood or Focus Stick to appear in the frame even with combinations identified as usable. ZD Front Mask for MISSION 1 Grip Set INON ZD Front Mask for MISSION 1 Grip Set ZD Front Mask for MISSION 1 Grip Set. Image: INON Inc. INON is also offering the ZD Front Mask for MISSION 1 Grip Set, which adds the 4D Light Grip and allows the MISSION 1 to be used with an optional underwater light. The standard ZD Front Mask includes a Male Adapter (GP), while the Grip Set includes the 4D Light Grip and Male Adapter (GP). 4D Light Grip INON 4D Light Grip. Image: INON Inc. The 4D Light Grip supports INON ZD Mount, GP and YS mounting systems. It measures approximately 135 mm (5.3 in) high × 28/19 mm (1.1/0.7 in) wide × 48 mm (1.9 in) deep and weighs approximately 60 g (2.1 oz) in air and 20 g (0.7 oz) underwater. A hand strap is included. JAN/EAN: 4570018121258 Installation VideoINON has also provided an installation video demonstrating how to install the ZD Front Mask for MISSION 1. Watch: How to install the ZD Front Mask for MISSION 1 FrontMask_Lens_Compatibility_MISSION1.pdf
-
Hi from Israel — AOW, mostly Eilat, phone + GoPro
Welcome to WaterPixels! We are glad to have you.
- DSC_6277_peeking.jpg
-
Our first Members Choice winners for August 2026
Photos that you like during the month.. lock after the month is over, you can not unlike or like again. Photos that you have not liked can be liked no matter when they were uploaded. In theory you would clear your queue.. with passes and likes. Then as new photos are uploaded you would like or pass. the results would be newly added photos every month. But not to dismiss photos already uploaded you can like older ones
-
Welcome Home — and Your Members Showcase
WaterPixels has always been about community—sharing work, comparing notes on gear, and celebrating images that stop you mid-scroll. We’ve refreshed the home page to put those images, conversations, and shared knowledge at the centre. A home page built around the communityWe’ve made more room for what makes WaterPixels yours: Featured photographs from the monthly Showcase, with photographer credits and a full-image viewer Our partners and affiliates Latest articles, community conversations, and the Showcase mosaic Clear paths into the forums, gallery, marketplace, and ways to support the community We’ve also refreshed About, bringing together our story and the people who keep WaterPixels going: the team, partners, and supporting members. It’s the same WaterPixels, with more of the community on show. Members Showcase: how the monthly cycle worksAt the heart of home is something the community already does well: enjoy each other’s photographs and choose which ones deserve the spotlight. Here’s how to take part: Upload to ShowcaseEach calendar month, you can add up to five images to Showcase. Member albums stay personal and unlimited; Showcase is the shared monthly pool. Review ShowcaseOpen Member Showcase Review, browse the photographs, and like those you’d love to see featured. You can also pass and move on to the next image. Your likes determine the results. See the monthly placementsOn the 1st of each month, we tally the previous month’s Showcase likes to determine first, second, and third place. First place earns Members Choice and leads the home-page hero. Second and third place rotate through the same space, each with full photographer credit. The results come directly from members’ likes. A quieter month may have fewer placements, but every month is an opportunity to discover someone’s work and help it reach more people. Upload a few favorites, spend a little time browsing, and give the photographs you admire a like. Together, you decide which images welcome everyone to WaterPixels. Start here: Review Showcase Partners, affiliates, and community supportWe’re pleased to welcome OM System as our first affiliate partner, and we’re working to bring more affiliates and partners on board. The refreshed site also introduces more advertising opportunities for brands that want to reach and support the underwater imaging community. If you’re interested in a partnership or advertising placement, please get in touch. That support helps keep WaterPixels a free, worldwide home for underwater photography, video, gear discussions, travel, and the marketplace, with member images and conversations at its centre. What we’d love from youUpload a few Showcase images this month. Review and like photographs you’d love to see featured. Explore About and tell us what feels right—and what still needs polish. Support the community however you can: shop, donate, share your knowledge, or simply join a conversation. One passion. One community. Endless inspiration.
-
Our first Members Choice winners for August 2026
Members Choice is live — and we have our first podium. Each month, Showcase likes decide 1st, 2nd, and 3rd. First place is Members Choice. Counts lock on the 1st of the next month, so the race stays fair. Here are the winners for August 2026: 1st — Members Choice: bvanant · 6 Showcase likes 2nd: ACHiPo · 4 Showcase likes 3rd: Dave_Hicks · 4 Showcase likes Congratulations to all three. These placements came from Showcase likes that month — so if you were out there liking photos you enjoy, you helped pick the podium. See Members Choice Results — the full podium archive, including August and every month ahead. How it worksBrowse and like photos on Member Showcase Review. On the 1st, we count likes from the month before and place 1st, 2nd, and 3rd. Winners appear on the home page, Showcase, and the Members Choice Results archive. Ties are handled by the date & time of the like. Like what you love this month — the next Members Choice is already underway.
-
Members Choice is coming — Showcase rules & a simpler way to like
WaterPixels is getting ready for Members Choice, and the new homepage will support it when we go live. (Forums will stay as is with no changes.) What’s coming Each month, community likes on Showcase photos will decide the top images. On the 1st of the month, we count likes from the month before and place 1st (Members Choice), 2nd, and 3rd. Those photos will be featured on the new homepage, and winners can receive award badges. Nobody picks winners by hand — the likes do. We’ll also introduce a Yearly Members Choice, based on Showcase likes across the full year. We’ll also roll out a new, easier way to like Showcase images (Member Showcase Review). Your existing likes are kept — current like history carries forward. Showcase rules (in place now) Up to 5 Showcase photos per calendar month (multi-file uploads use only the slots you have left). Delete frees a slot for that month. Deleting also removes that photo’s likes, so they won’t count toward Members Choice. You can’t replace the photo file on edit (caption/credit only). Need a different shot? Delete and upload a new one. Member Albums stay unlimited and do not get counted in Showcase. What to do now Keep uploading to Showcase within the monthly limit, and keep liking photos you want to see on the front page. When the new homepage and Review flow go live, Members Choice will use that same like activity — with winning photos featured on the homepage and badges for the placed shots. Likes will also feed toward Yearly Members Choice. More details will follow as we flip the switch. Questions welcome in this thread.
-
X-Ray Mag #142 Released
-
Would You Enter An Annual WaterPixels Underwater Photo Contest?
Thinking it would be more useful if I posted the draft copy of the guidelines we were working on for this contest. Clearly this does not have the changes for Entry fees but we have more time to plan this now. I could see adapting this to any contest we may host and I am also using this as a development document for setting up rules in a backup system. The system will be pretty much automated on taking entries, Judge private invites in to the system, Contest deadline management, all aspects of the judging process including RAW file reviews to awards and members choice and the public publishing of everything. SO for a conversational piece, your direct input on this document as a skeleton rule set for future Waterpixel use, I am interested in hearing. Thanks... WaterPixels_Contest_Rules_DRAFT.pdf
-
Would You Enter An Annual WaterPixels Underwater Photo Contest?
I think taking a step back is the move for now. give me time to finish developing the system rather then being rushed to get it done for this coming calendar year. Host a contest in 2027 to trial run it with the suggestions gathered here. Category noted.. thanks. The donation highlight is not a bad idea but then anyone could be featured for a fee.. so maybe not the thing to do. Originally I wanted to make that member choice gallery, so the images that appear are the most rated images by members. So the front page gallery would be community driven. Yeah I put donation on store a while back. thanks Klaus... 🤙
-
Would You Enter An Annual WaterPixels Underwater Photo Contest?
yes we have been working on that behind the scenes. some site adjustments and we will reach out and pursue that more. The initial release of LinkCards will be later today or tomorrow. On the initial release you have the ability to setup a gallery, contact information on multiple custom buttons. WhatsApp link, email, phone etc.. also you can control background, themes, and change colors of text. pretty customizable for a little tool. will post release article soon...
-
Would You Enter An Annual WaterPixels Underwater Photo Contest?
Thanks for the honest feedback—this is exactly why we asked before building the whole thing, more feedback is welcome. I will leave the poll up until it expires and also welcome more discussion. A few things may not be clear. The companies that have banners on our forum are supporters of WaterPixels and not truly advertisers. We do not receive payment, and we see the banners as a way of helping members reach companies we believe are of value. We are looking into the possibility of charging for these banners in the future. The forum, gallery, and articles will remain free. What we’re exploring are optional extras that provide value to members while helping the community support itself. As you know, forum membership is free. WaterPixels staff cover the operating costs. This is not really sustainable in the long term, and we need to identify a way to raise the necessary revenue. Based on today’s pricing, it costs approximately $720 per year—or $60 per month—to operate WaterPixels. That covers VPS hosting for the forum, gallery, and uploads; the domain name; daily off-site backups; SSL; and the Invision Community self-hosted license. As the photo library grows, storage and backup costs may grow with it. No single source is likely to cover that amount. Merchandise, useful optional features, community events, donations, and appropriate sponsor support can each contribute. Together, they may allow WaterPixels to become self-sustaining. We already sell merchandise, with the profit going to the site account. We’ve made some sales, but they’ve been sporadic and haven’t generated as much support as we had hoped. Members have also made donations, which we genuinely appreciate. The contest was intended to do two things: create a fun community photography event and provide a little support for the platform. The calendar would have been printed on demand, with each winner receiving a copy. Entry fees were intended to cover those copies and contribute something toward the site—not turn WaterPixels into a commercial contest. That said, we’ve heard your concerns about charging $5 per image. The cost can add up quickly for members who want to submit several photos, so we agree that a per-image fee isn’t the right approach. Rather than rushing the event—or the development of the management system needed to run contests properly—we’re pulling back from holding one this year. Instead, we may organize a community photography event in early 2027, potentially with sponsor support. That would give us time to develop the necessary tools, work through the details with members, and create an event that is well planned and worthwhile. After that event, we can revisit the idea of a fundraising calendar as a separate community discussion. Nothing has been decided, and any future calendar proposal would take the feedback we’ve received into account. We’ve also developed Link Cards as a bonus service for members and another small way to help generate revenue for the site. The feature will be available soon. A Link Card gives you a personal page on WaterPixels that works like a home page or Linktree. You can add links to your website, Instagram, Facebook, and other places, share the page from your phone, and display a gallery that feels like your own space. Example: waterpixels.net/u/yourname Link Cards will cost $5 per year and are entirely optional. Use one if it’s useful to you; if it isn’t, that’s completely fine. It’s your choice, and nothing else about your access to WaterPixels will change. Thank you again for speaking honestly. Your feedback helped us recognize that the original contest proposal needed more thought. We’ll take the time to develop the event properly, explore sponsor involvement, and continue the conversation with the community as we move forward.
-
Would You Enter An Annual WaterPixels Underwater Photo Contest?
well we can't put a video in a calendar.. 😂 working on making the site more videographer friendly thou. Possibly later add some sort of contest for video if the user base wants it.
-
Would You Enter An Annual WaterPixels Underwater Photo Contest?
We're considering launching the First Annual WaterPixels Underwater Photography Contest, and before we go too far with planning and development, we'd like to hear from the community. The idea is to create an annual WaterPixels competition judged by a panel of underwater photographers, with categories covering different styles of underwater photography. Winning images would be featured in the official WaterPixels 2027 Calendar, which would be available for purchase through the WaterPixels Shop. Each photographer selected for the calendar would receive a complimentary copy. A dedicated contest page will be added to the site to list winners each year with optional Bio, Contact info listed on the site for some exposure if wanted, or simply just simple photo credit.. its up to the winner what the would like. We're considering an entry fee of $5 per image, with photographers able to enter up to 10 images total, with a maximum of 3 images in any one category. The contest isn't intended to be a major commercial competition. Entry fees and proceeds from calendar sales would go toward supporting the costs of hosting, maintaining, and continuing to develop the WaterPixels community. We're also considering a Members' Choice Award, giving WaterPixels members the opportunity to vote for their favorite images from the finalists. Before we put the work into making this happen, we'd really like to know if this is something our members would actually participate in. Ive started a Contest management system for just this but before I get in to some serious time on it.. just want to see what we are looking at for interest. If low response.. we will just table it until next year and ask again and ill work on other things for the site. Please vote in the poll and leave a comment with your thoughts, suggestions, or concerns. We'd especially like to hear what would make you more—or less—likely to enter.
-
WpX New feature: Link Cards
It’s your own public page — same idea as Linktree. One link with your name on it: cover photo, buttons, email, phone, and a photo gallery on the back. The address is waterpixels.net/u/your-name A web presence without building a website. If people use it, we may grow it later. Slap a QR on a water bottle. Save it to your Home Screen like an app and send the link from your phone — tap to share, AirDrop, text, whatever you already do. Your profile’s Link Card tab shows visits and which buttons got tapped. Private analytics, just for you. Forums, Marketplace, and articles stay free and work the same. This is optional feature. You can draft for free. 2 Ways to make Public... $5 a year, paid on the site, makes it live. It auto-renews until you cancel. Cancel anytime and the card stays active through the year you already paid for. A separate donation made in the shop will also unlock for 1 year. After that year, you would subscribe direct on the Link Card page or donate in the shop again. How to get yours Open your profile page and click Link Card. Hit Create Link Card. Add your name, photos, links, and contact. Watch the preview, then save. It’s a draft. Only you can open the link until you publish. Pay $5 when you’re ready to go public. Give it a try in draft mode... Questions, ask here.
- New from California
-
Image Attachment Not Working
Ok great.... The attach bar is fetched when you click a blank reply, then inserted. That insert has a bug. For almost everyone it still works. Your browser session was the only one we saw that got an extra script in that fetch, so the bug skipped the “Drag files here…” block. Something on your side is making the software send that extra script. The best fit is your browser language set to French while the account is English, or an extension / VPN changing headers or cookies. The work around I put on the site seems to be workin.... I have reported the bug to Invision. If a blank reply ever loses the attach area again, tell me.
-
Image Attachment Not Working
I can see the request succeeding and the HTML arriving. The next bit is in how the browser adds that HTML to the page, and I’ve put a small fix in for that. Could you refresh the topic (Cmd/Ctrl-Shift-R) and click the empty reply box once more? If “Drag files here…” shows up, we’re done. The French Windows test can wait.
-
Image Attachment Not Working
Thanks — that 20-second wait matches what we captured. The request for the attachment bar succeeded and the HTML was in the response; it just never got added to the page on your machine. Your Swiss-French Windows idea is a good test. The forum account is already set to English; what’s different is the browser reporting language Fr. If you get a chance to switch the PC (or just Edge) to English and click the empty reply box once, that would tell us whether locale is involved. No rush, and you don’t need DevTool
-
Image Attachment Not Working
I have now captured the failure on your account twice, automatically, without you needing DevTools. Once on this topic at 17:04, and once in a private message at 19:39. Same result both times. Invision does have a client-side debug path, but it is switched off in the version they ship. When the attachment area fails to appear, the software calls Debug.error() — and in production that call goes nowhere. Debug starts disabled, nothing ever turns it on, and no adapter is registered to write those messages anywhere. The failure never reaches the server logs, which is why there was nothing useful to look at on our side. So I added a small diagnostic of our own. It watches the reply box expand, records whether the attachment request happened, what came back, and whether the "Drag files here..." bar actually appeared in the page. That is how we caught your two failures today. It does not collect the text of unsent messages — only whether the attachment UI loaded. The request that fetches the attachment area does reach the server, and the server answers 200 OK with a full response. The upload library also loads. After that, the bar never appears in the page. It isn't hidden, and it isn't being removed by an extension — it simply never gets inserted. New topics, post edits, and any reply box that already has text in it ship the attachment area with the page. A blank reply box (forum or messenger) fetches it afterwards. Only that second path is failing for you. Your account is not the problem. Two other members on Windows 11 with Chromium 151 also work. Zoom, High Contrast, and storage are all fine on the sessions we captured. Object.assign ERROR You were right to flag that, and the analysis you posted got the structure genuinely right — new topics load the editor in full, replies fetch part of it separately. That matches the source code exactly. The error itself turned out to be a dead end. I get that identical "Cannot convert undefined or null to object" message on my own machine, in a session where uploading works perfectly. It is a harmless ordering bug in the notification code, unrelated to attachments. Real, and worth chasing, and I did chase it. It just didn't lead anywhere. Could you try once more, on this topic, the same way it usually fails — click into the empty reply box and wait a few seconds. If the attachment area still doesn't appear, you don't need to paste anything from DevTools. A short "still missing" here is enough; we will already have the diagnostic. If you have a moment, a second try in a private message (empty reply box again) would be useful too. That is the other place we saw it fail. thanks...
-
Image Attachment Not Working
I wanted to reply directly to this also, I am sorry it came across like I, or we, were dismissing the problem or putting it on you. That was not the intent. The reason I kept asking for the raw console errors is that I need them to debug this properly, and also to give Invision something specific if we need to submit it to them. A Copilot summary can be useful, but it is not enough on its own. Invision will need the actual error text, file name, line/function, browser, and the exact steps that trigger it. The error you sent is helpful because it gives us something real to trace. That said, the error appears to be coming from Invision's notification/checking script, not directly from the image uploader itself. So it may be related, or it may just be another JavaScript error happening on the same page. I do not want to claim either way until we know more. So I am not ignoring the issue, and I am not ruling out that something on the site is involved. I am also not ruling out that something local to your browser/profile could still be blocking part of the reply editor, since the same page is working for others. That could be cached site data, browser storage, an extension, a privacy/security setting, or something specific to that Edge profile. It is also possible that something is cached somewhere between the server and you. I am trying to separate what we know from what we do not know, so we can either fix it here or give Invision a proper report. I appreciate you sending the extra details. I know this has been aggravating, but the console output does help. Also, please remember that we all volunteer to run this site for free for you all. Time zones make things harder, and as the more technical admin I am fitting this around my normal work schedule, which is often 60 hours a week. Your patience is appreciated. It is being worked on, even if it cannot always move as quickly as either of us would like.
-
Image Attachment Not Working
thanks.. good night ill research more..
-
Image Attachment Not Working
Thanks. The Copilot summary is useful as a clue, but we need the raw browser console output, not Copilot’s interpretation of it. The reason is that Copilot may be summarizing, guessing, or connecting errors that are not actually the cause. To investigate this properly — and especially if we need to send it to Invision — we need the exact original error text, file name, and line number shown by Edge. When you have time tomorrow, please do this: 1. Open the page where reply upload/paste fails. 2. Press F12. 3. Go to the Console tab. 4. Clear the console. 5. Click into the reply editor. 6. Try to paste/upload an image. 7. Copy/paste the actual red console errors here, or send a screenshot. What we know so far is useful: - New topics/new messages work. - Editing an existing post/message works. - The initial reply composer fails on your affected machines. That points us toward the reply editor initialization, but we need the raw console error to confirm where it is failing.
-
Image Attachment Not Working
Thanks — your latest tests are actually very useful, because they narrow the problem down a lot. From what you’ve shown, this is not a simple upload permission or quota issue. Your account can upload images, and the server does accept them. We can see that uploads work when you create a new topic/private message, and your screenshot also shows that uploads work when you edit a message after posting it. The pattern now looks much more specific: - New topic/new message editor: works - Edit existing post/message: works - Initial reply editor: fails for you - Replying to a private message: also fails for you - Windows 11/Edge works for some of us, but not on your affected machines So the issue appears to be with the initial reply editor/quick-reply editor not fully initializing the attachment/paste component on your setup. That is a much narrower and more useful diagnosis than “uploads are blocked.” I also want to be careful about the Copilot explanation. It may be pointing in the right direction, but we need the actual browser console error from your machine rather than only Copilot’s interpretation of what it can see client side, From our side we cannot currently reproduce the failure, No other members in the same group are saying they have the same problem and the page does not show the same error for us who have tested it. The best next step is: 1. Open the affected reply page. 2. Press F12. 3. Go to Console. 4. Clear the console. 5. Click into the reply box. 6. Try to paste an image. 7. Screenshot any red errors exactly as they appear. If possible, please also do the same test in an Edge InPrivate window with extensions disabled. Not because we are blaming your setup, but because we need to know whether the failing reply editor is caused by cached/script state, an extension/security layer, or an Invision editor bug.