10 hours ago, ChrisRoss said:
Fair enough, my thinking was doing two full superchargers would be 10 hours vs 4 and a bit hours with something like the MAHA.
If you want something slower there is also this charger: https://mahaenergy.com/mh-c800s/
It uses 500mA as the soft charge rate instead of 1000mA and may be more readily available perhaps? STandard rate is 1000 mA which is 2-3 hrs charge time and soft rate is 500mA for 5-6 hours charge rate.
I have seen references stating that charging the batteries too slowly can also present problems - I found one reference on the MAHA site that recommended not charging at below 0.33C where C is the capacity in mAhr which for a 2500 mAhr battery is 825 mA, which would argue that a 1000mA charge current is not unreasonable for a battery of that capacity. See this article for example: https://batteryuniversity.com/article/bu-408-charging-nickel-metal-hydride
I have been using the 800S and considered the 980 but have been unable to determine if the 980 will charge eneloops to 100% at a suitable fixed charge rate, or will instead go to about 90% and then switch to slow trickle despite saying "done." That is what the 800S is doing, leaving me to guess when the trickle charge phase is done. Also, it can be damaging to the batteries over time to leave them on a trickling charger beyond a full charge, so charging overnight or while gone during the day is poor practice. None of that posed much of a problem before because my prior flash units did not go through batteries so fast and of course I only needed 8 charged batteries at a time. Needing to replace 16 batteries every day or every other day at the most will require more attention to battery charging. If the 980 does not trickle charge, I would likely get one. I called powerex to try and ask, but calls go directly to a voicemail and no one has yet called me back.
https://lygte-info.dk/info/batteryChargingNiMH UK.html older article but addresses the needs of batteries like eneloops
https://lygte-info.dk/review/Review Charger Panasonic BQ-CC55 UK.html
https://lygte-info.dk/review/Review Charger Panasonic BQ-CC17 UK.html similar circuitry as the CC63 I mentioned, but a slightly higher charge rate than the cc63. The cc63 might be lower than optimum. I am having second thoughts about this option.
I may just use two BQ-CC55 chargers. They have been tested and reviewed well and are fairly fast. Using two gives me some backup in case one were to fail. I just need to hope there are two available wall sockets. wherever I go, but that should rarely be a problem.
Perhaps I will eventually hear back from Powerex, and if so I will update.