Jump to content

Featured Replies

1 hour ago, Sokrates said:

Already second version? That was fast.

Totally different product. It magically turns a 90mm lens into a 60mm. 🤔

Edited by Dave_Hicks

Then why not use a 60 (or a 50 for Sony)?

Use a dome to calm the aberrations!

Much smaller and lighter rig than what is illustrated....

7 minutes ago, dentrock said:

Then why not use a 60 (or a 50 for Sony)?

Use a dome to calm the aberrations!

Much smaller and lighter rig than what is illustrated....

in one of the last shows of the underwater photography show, Alex and Matthew talked about this lens:

Probably nice if you shoot 105 often, but at times you wished you brought a 60 macro for slightly bigger stuff.

1 minute ago, Dave_Hicks said:

Totally different product. If magically turns a 90mm lens into a 60mm. 🤔

14 minutes ago, RobinD said:

in one of the last shows of the underwater photography show, Alex and Matthew talked about this lens:

Probably nice if you shoot 105 often, but at times you wished you brought a 60 macro for slightly bigger stuff.

Then change lenses and do another dive!

But i think this was made for camera systems that don't have great lenses options. Which one could that be??

I asked Nauticam to look into designing such a lens specifically because of the limitations of only having a one "decent" focal length macro lens on Sony FF (90mm) and Canon FF (100mm) camera systems. The MFO-2 basically converts the Canon 100mm into a 60mm macro and the Sony 90mm (or Tamron 90mm, I used today) into a 50mm lens - while keeping the fast AF (arguably helping it focus faster) and high quality optics of these popular lenses (and adding some water correction for good measure).

These are simple test shots from toady. First a coral: left - 90mm alone, right - 90mm + MFO-2 - I am sharing screenshots straight from Lightroom without processing:

Screenshot 2025-06-18 at 19.44.31.jpg

Note it is hard to do an exact and exact comparison on real subjects because the MFO-2 requires refocusing. But it really makes a big difference to the field of view - I'd say at least the difference between the macro lenses many of us have spent years choosing between.

Such shorter focal length macro lenses are very valuable for those that dive in poor visibility, for those that like some of the larger macro subjects (octopuses, frogfish, seahorses etc) and for blackwater photographers. And the lack of good options is a frustration. I made the request for this lens after my blackwater trip in March and it is exciting to see it already - I expected it to be more of a niche product for these specific users...

I was surprised how long the lens is, which left me concerned it would be hard to aim and could unbalance the rig. The lens needs to be this size to perform well optically, but it is surprising lightweight for its size - and just a little negative underwater. However I was actually surprised that adding this lens makes the rig very comfortable and it feels very natural to shoot through it on a dive. Being noticeably wider than the standard macro lens it is actually even easier to aim and compose than the standard lens. I passed it to a friend during today's dive and he just got on with shooting it (I had to demand it back)!

The image quality with the MFO-2 is very good. It is impressively sharp across the frame, with some mild CA creeping in at the corners. I'd like to test back to back to be sure, but I feel it is better in the corners than a Sony 50mm or Nikon 60mm behind a flat port, but behind how these lenses before behind a curved port. Anyway - it is very, very good.

This shot shows corner frame detail at 100% on unprocessed RAW file (50MP camera)

Screenshot 2025-06-18 at 20.12.53.jpg

And here is another more central in frame - this time 200% zoom in on a 50MP file.

Screenshot 2025-06-18 at 20.10.45.jpg

It also focuses right to the front element - although like a port this starts to limit lighting options. Here is my finger (uncropped) to show smallest subjects it suits (same as 50/60mm on full frame, really).

Screenshot 2025-06-18 at 20.26.41.jpg

Now I have dived with it, its great strength is that it is light and easy to carry on all macro dives. Meaning that macro dives are no longer a decision between 105 or 60mm, you can now have both options, always. So when you see a great macro subject you can get two totally different macro shots of it very quickly.

Before I used it underwater a serious M43 user (OM-1) on the trip asked me if he should order one. I said "No! You have the option of 4 macro focal lengths already, this isn't really for you." After the dive I said "Try it - if you do you will want one - it is so nice having the option of two macro primes with every subject."

The MFO-2 is quite long - but this makes it light too - which makes it very comfortable to dive with and very natural to shoot with (contrary to what you might think with the length) - I really can't see me doing many macro dives without it. It was designed for FF Sony and Canon FF users frustrated with a lack of macro options. But others may be interested too, may turns to will if you get to try one.

Hope this is helpful.

Edited by Alex_Mustard

Hi Alex

Thanks for the explanation I'm using the Canon RF100 and YES a lot of time i was frustrated having a to big magnification.

Did you have some indication of the price?

6 minutes ago, CaolIla said:



Did you have some indication of the price?

No idea.

The normal rule in underwater photography is think of the maximum amount you can possibly justify or afford and then double it!

On 6/18/2025 at 8:42 AM, Dave_Hicks said:

Totally different product. It magically turns a 90mm lens into a 60mm. 🤔

Yes i see that now, and after Alex's explanation.

I didnt even think in the photo that it would be that big, thought the SMC-3 in the photo was the new MFO-2 🤣

But is MFO-2 appropriate name for it? Its not really mid range focus optimising anymore? More like VMC (Voodoo Magic Converter).

Nice, but I still would prefer an add-on lens that would convert my 30mm macro into a 50mm macro (without decreasing or even increasing the minimum focus distance)

Important Information

Terms of Use Privacy Policy Guidelines We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.